<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-10-28" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3207" />
  <endPage num="3338" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
      <text id="201510287a25278082164bfc90000442">
        <heading>Gillman Land Sale</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-10-28">
            <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-10-28T14:41:32" />
        <text id="201510287a25278082164bfc90000443">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-28T14:41:32" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:41):</by>  A final supplementary: minister, was the relocation of Incitec Pivot to the Gillman area part of the government's agreement to purchase Incitec's existing site at Port Adelaide?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Child Protection Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-10-28">
            <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-10-28T14:41:48" />
        <text id="201510287a25278082164bfc90000444">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-28T14:41:48" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Child Protection Reform) (14:41):</by>  Again, I would have to check whether or not there is any formal arrangement there, but my recollection of the whole proposition is as I have already indicated to the parliament. The storage of certain materials in that precinct is anathema to a commercial and residential development in that precinct adjacent to a warehouse for particular chemicals, which it was, so of course there were discussions with Incitec Pivot about how we might achieve the benefit of having a large area of the port that would otherwise have been, in effect, sterilised for any sort of reasonable development to become available at some point in time for appropriate development.</text>
        <text id="201510287a25278082164bfc90000445">Obviously there were conversations with them and, as I have already said, my recollection is that there was some opportunity made available for them to have a relocation option in the general vicinity. But if you are wanting the fine grain on that, obviously I would need to look at whatever documents are involved and seek advice on that.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>