<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-10-28" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3207" />
  <endPage num="3338" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
      <text id="20151028cd1e73753b1a41f1b0000429">
        <heading>Gillman Land Sale</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-10-28">
            <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-10-28T14:38:41" />
        <text id="20151028cd1e73753b1a41f1b0000430">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-28T14:38:41" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:38):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Housing and Urban Development. Has Incitec Pivot been offered a site within the land subject to the ACP deal to relocate their enterprise, and, if so, has it been accepted?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Child Protection Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-10-28">
            <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-10-28T14:38:57" />
        <text id="20151028cd1e73753b1a41f1b0000431">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-28T14:38:57" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Child Protection Reform) (14:38):</by>  I will need to check on the details of that, but it is the case that Incitec Pivot has been occupying a site very close to an area of the Port Adelaide inner harbour that we have long had the ambition to enliven with activity and to be part of a renewal of the whole Port Adelaide precinct. Of course, the presence of that particular activity adjacent to that doesn't really go well together because, as members would possibly be aware, the chemicals they have require some degree of a buffer precinct around which there should be, certainly, no housing development.</text>
        <text id="20151028cd1e73753b1a41f1b0000432">Yes, there have been talks about Incitec Pivot at some point leaving their present premises, thereby enabling opportunities to occur at the inner harbour and moving to nearby premises but not immediately adjacent. As to exactly where that discussion is up to, I am not going to guess, but in general terms there has been conversation about their moving, and my recollection is that the idea was that there was some opportunity for some land to be made available in that North Arm area. To get the precise answer to the particular question, I will need to take the rest of that on notice.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>