<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-10-28" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3207" />
  <endPage num="3338" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
      <text id="20151028f98539da0cb146f3b0000389">
        <heading>Gillman Land Sale</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-10-28">
            <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-10-28T14:31:08" />
        <text id="20151028f98539da0cb146f3b0000390">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-28T14:31:08" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:31):</by>  Far from it being that you wouldn't rule it out, is it not actually included in the contract that this land can be used as a site for fill to be deposited?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-10-28">
            <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-10-28T14:31:21" />
        <text id="20151028f98539da0cb146f3b0000391">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-28T14:31:21" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (14:31):</by>  All of these matters have been canvassed at length in Commissioner Lander's report. Maybe we just have to accept that we've got a different vision for this site: you want to use it as a dump, we want to turn it into employment lands. Maybe they are the two visions we put in front of the people of South Australia or, more importantly, maybe the future is that it should just lie there doing nothing for 30 years, much like the Liberal Party of South Australia—empty, barren, nothing happening here, no ideas.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>