<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-10-28" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3207" />
  <endPage num="3338" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
      <text id="20151028916c7af98a4542cbb0000375">
        <heading>Gillman Land Sale</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-10-28">
            <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-10-28T14:28:39" />
        <text id="20151028916c7af98a4542cbb0000376">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-28T14:28:39" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:28):</by>  My question is to the Premier. How can the Premier substantiate his suggestion that there was no other prospect for the development of the Gillman site which would have created jobs when the commissioner references the Land Management Corporation's announcement that the land would be put to tender and that other parties had already put forward a proposal for a joint venture to develop part of the site?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-10-28">
            <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-10-28T14:29:04" />
        <text id="20151028916c7af98a4542cbb0000377">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-28T14:29:04" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (14:29):</by>  Well, we're not interested in somebody using this site as a dump. We want it to be developed for employment land. That's our ambition for the site, and I'm sure that there are people who want to use the site for their private economic benefit. What we're interested in is the public interest, and the public benefit. So, that's the reason we took the stance that we did.</text>
        <text id="20151028916c7af98a4542cbb0000378">Sure, it is unusual to entertain an unsolicited bid in this fashion, and you only do it in exceptional cases where the benefit is a high benefit. Also, the other factor here is, of course, we were worried about losing the opportunity.</text>
        <text id="20151028916c7af98a4542cbb0000379">This is an extraordinary proposition. Somebody is going to spend a couple of hundred million dollars of their money making our land more valuable. That is something you want to look at. That is something you want to give a chance to actually work. We are not as interested in somebody using our land as a dump. I think we are entitled to take a view about that, which we did—</text>
        <text id="20151028916c7af98a4542cbb0000380">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20151028916c7af98a4542cbb0000381">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —and that is at the heart of the matter.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20151028916c7af98a4542cbb0000382">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Mount Gambier is warned for the second and final time, and the member for Chaffey is warned. Leader.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>