<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-10-28" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3207" />
  <endPage num="3338" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
      <text id="2015102815c76c0c334645fa90000371">
        <heading>Gillman Land Sale</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-10-28">
            <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-10-28T14:27:06" />
        <text id="2015102815c76c0c334645fa90000372">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-28T14:27:06" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:27):</by>  A question for the Treasurer: does the Treasurer agree with the Independent Commissioner Against Corruption's finding that the eventual appointment of the probity advisers amounted to an attempt to ensure that it would be perceived that the URA had conducted itself appropriately in the process, but no more?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-10-28">
            <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-10-28T14:27:24" />
        <text id="2015102815c76c0c334645fa90000373">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-28T14:27:24" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (14:27):</by>  We've already indicated we accept all of the findings, good and bad, that have been made by Commissioner Lander. So, of course we accept all the findings. We've made that known publicly; that's the position of the government in relation to the findings. We have taken them seriously, and we are seeking to respond to the criticisms. But those opposite should also acknowledge those elements of the report which are beneficial to the government and which do not amount to criticisms of either the minister or myself.</text>
        <text id="2015102815c76c0c334645fa90000374">The member asked the question seeking to cast some blame or criticism on the Treasurer or, indeed, myself, but that goes further than the findings that were made by the commissioner. I understand why the opposition would want to conduct its own inquiry and make its own findings, but, fortunately, we are relying upon an independent commissioner who is well respected, and if he hasn't chosen to make those criticisms of the Treasurer, I don't think it's really within the province of the deputy leader to add her own gloss, if you like, on the report.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>