<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-10-27" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3077" />
  <endPage num="3205" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Barossa Country Cabinet</name>
      <text id="20151027a17fd9e3558e45c890000806">
        <heading>Barossa Country Cabinet</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="546" kind="question">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">MacKillop</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-10-27">
            <name>Barossa Country Cabinet</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-10-27T15:14:28" />
        <text id="20151027a17fd9e3558e45c890000807">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-27T15:14:28" />
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS (MacKillop) (15:14):</by>  Given the glowing terms in which the minister described the company Treasury Wine Estates, how is it that his government came to the conclusion that it needed a further $2 million of taxpayers' money?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Finance</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Small Business</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-10-27">
            <name>Barossa Country Cabinet</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-10-27T15:14:43" />
        <text id="20151027a17fd9e3558e45c890000808">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-27T15:14:43" />
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens—Treasurer, Minister for Finance, Minister for State Development, Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy, Minister for Small Business) (15:14):</by>  When the opposition call on me to cut payroll tax, that's giving taxpayers' money back to business. Are we to interview every single business that would receive a tax cut and see if they're worthy? There is a process in place where these grants are applied for. The independent Public Service assess them, make recommendations to government and we act on them. What we are really hearing from the opposition is, 'Why did you give a regional—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20151027a17fd9e3558e45c890000809">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER:</by>  Point of order, sir. Under 98, the minister clearly isn't responsible for the opposition—and debate.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20151027a17fd9e3558e45c890000810">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I will listen carefully to how the minister answers the question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20151027a17fd9e3558e45c890000811">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  I make no apologies for returning money to the private sector. I make no apology for returning public money to the private sector, and I can't believe that the modern Liberal Party is complaining about us returning taxpayers' money to the private sector. Then again, that is the modern Liberal Party, where they are opposed to privatising government monopolies.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20151027a17fd9e3558e45c890000812">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  Point of order: this is clearly debate.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20151027a17fd9e3558e45c890000813">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Yes, I uphold the point of order. Does the member for MacKillop have a further supplementary?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20151027a17fd9e3558e45c890000814">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS:</by>  No.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20151027a17fd9e3558e45c890000815">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Adelaide.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>