<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-10-27" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3077" />
  <endPage num="3205" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>South Australian Economy</name>
      <text id="201510277bccedd1cf664d7490000737">
        <heading>South Australian Economy</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4342" kind="question">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Stuart</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-10-27">
            <name>South Australian Economy</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-10-27T14:56:18" />
        <text id="201510277bccedd1cf664d7490000738">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-27T14:56:18" />
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN (Stuart) (14:56):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Given the advice released yesterday by CommSec that the South Australian economy is predicted to soon become the worst performing of all states in the nation, does the Premier stand by his comments during question time last sitting week that the South Australian economy is faring no worse than other states?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-10-27">
            <name>South Australian Economy</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-10-27T14:56:40" />
        <text id="201510277bccedd1cf664d7490000739">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-27T14:56:40" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (14:56):</by>  Yes, I do stand by my remarks. For the benefit of—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>An honourable member</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201510277bccedd1cf664d7490000740">
          <by role="office">An honourable member:</by>  Are CommSec wrong?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201510277bccedd1cf664d7490000741">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Those opposite do tend to seize on whatever they can find. They not only go to the most pessimistic reports they can find but they also go to the most pessimistic element of the most pessimistic report they can find. For instance, they utterly ignored the NAB Monthly Business Survey in September, which had South Australia recording the highest improvement in confidence, rising by 21 index points, followed by—</text>
        <text id="201510277bccedd1cf664d7490000742">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201510277bccedd1cf664d7490000743">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —well, it's only one report—Western Australia and Queensland. Confidence weakened in most other states, and we actually had the highest business confidence of any of the states. But if you want to go to CommSec, let's talk about the CommSec report. The CommSec report is not measuring state growth rates in an absolute sense but against decade averages on eight quarterly indicators selected by CommSec. So, in that sense, the report is actually talking more about the past than it is about the present performance of the South Australian economy. That's the first thing: it's being misused to describe the current state of play in the South Australian economy.</text>
        <page num="3117" />
        <text id="201510277bccedd1cf664d7490000744">Analysing the figures, depending on how you look at the figures, really tells you a different story. For example, if you look at the ANZ Stateometer, which has just been released, I think,  today, it plots the performance of states on 16 indicators measured monthly, using four quadrants. According to that, South Australia's economy is performing better than Western Australia and the ACT. If you look at the CommSec report itself, South Australia ranks third in population growth and equipment investment but seventh out of eight on three indicators—economic growth, retail and dwelling starts.</text>
        <text id="201510277bccedd1cf664d7490000745">If you want to choose another measure, compared to a year earlier, nominal retail turnover in August 2015 was 4.2 per cent higher in South Australia—the third-strongest rate of growth amongst the states in trend terms. The number of housing finance commitments by owner-occupiers in August 2015 was 2.9 per cent higher than a year ago and 18 per cent higher than the low point reached in September 2012. CommSec doesn't include dwelling approvals as part of its list of indicators, so it really depends what you focus on.</text>
        <text id="201510277bccedd1cf664d7490000746">But, really, all of this comes to nought: the essential point is that we know we have challenges and what would be good for a change is if we had something other than the empty negative rhetoric of those opposite about coming up with a solution. It is palpable; the talk of the town is how hopeless the opposition are. It is the talk of the town.</text>
        <text id="201510277bccedd1cf664d7490000747">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201510277bccedd1cf664d7490000748">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  You might laugh—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201510277bccedd1cf664d7490000749">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER:</by>  Point of order, sir.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201510277bccedd1cf664d7490000750">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The point of order is?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201510277bccedd1cf664d7490000751">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER:</by>  The Premier is now straying.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201510277bccedd1cf664d7490000752">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I uphold the point of order. I am shocked to have to call to order the member for Flinders and the member for Davenport. I also call to order the Minister for Investment and Trade, and I warn for the first time the member for Chaffey, who I can hear all the way down there.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>