<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-10-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2991" />
  <endPage num="3076" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
      <text id="20151015a5a4a4a50e3946eb90000453">
        <heading>Gillman Land Sale</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-10-15">
            <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-10-15T14:25:34" />
        <text id="20151015a5a4a4a50e3946eb90000454">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-15T14:25:34" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:25):</by>  My question is to the Premier: does the Premier think it is appropriate that a minister of the Crown should be such a difficult witness when giving evidence to the Independent Commissioner against Corruption?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-10-15">
            <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-10-15T14:25:46" />
        <text id="20151015a5a4a4a50e3946eb90000455">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-15T14:25:46" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (14:25):</by>  I know those opposite were hoping for something different out of the Ombudsman's inquiry conducted by Commissioner Lander and they seek to travel beyond his findings to make political points in this place. We have accepted the criticisms that are contained in the report of the Treasurer.</text>
        <text id="20151015a5a4a4a50e3946eb90000456">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20151015a5a4a4a50e3946eb90000457">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  No, he accepts—</text>
        <text id="20151015a5a4a4a50e3946eb90000458">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20151015a5a4a4a50e3946eb90000459">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The leader is living dangerously.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20151015a5a4a4a50e3946eb90000460">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  It is inappropriate to cite passages of transcript which ultimately don't lead to findings in this report. It is the findings that are relevant and it is the findings that we have accepted, and the findings, when they have led to findings of inappropriate language, have been apologised for.</text>
        <text id="20151015a5a4a4a50e3946eb90000461">If the commissioner had decided to make further and other findings about the Treasurer, I think we can see, from the tenor of his report, he would not have hesitated to do that, but we are simply not going to permit those opposite to conduct their own further elaboration on a very significant piece of work that was conducted by an eminent jurist who has made findings, and we stand by those findings.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>