<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-10-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2991" />
  <endPage num="3076" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Ministerial Code of Conduct</name>
      <text id="20151015b53f84f48ec245a690000374">
        <heading>Ministerial Code of Conduct</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-10-15">
            <name>Ministerial Code of Conduct</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-10-15T14:07:32" />
        <text id="20151015b53f84f48ec245a690000375">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-15T14:07:32" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:07):</by>  Were any notes of that meeting taken?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-10-15">
            <name>Ministerial Code of Conduct</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-10-15T14:07:35" />
        <text id="20151015b53f84f48ec245a690000376">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-15T14:07:35" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (14:07):</by>  For Godsakes. This is a pathetic line of question.</text>
        <text id="20151015b53f84f48ec245a690000377">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20151015b53f84f48ec245a690000378">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  There could not be a more public performance of every single element of this equation. At 9am the report was communicated to my office. I read it over the period of time between that time and the time when the minister came into my office. I had a meeting which went for something of the order of an hour where we discussed all of the implications of that report.</text>
        <text id="20151015b53f84f48ec245a690000379">I made it clear to him that the conduct, that the language that he used, was inappropriate. He acknowledged that. We discussed in detail why the behaviour was inappropriate. I outlined those reasons in the house. The minister then went out publicly and acknowledged every element of why the behaviour was inappropriate, so it demonstrated that he understood that.</text>
        <page num="3020" />
        <text id="20151015b53f84f48ec245a690000380">This sits at the heart of proper disciplinary processes when one is raising questions of behaviour and performance in the context of an environment where a superior is seeking to raise matters and have changed conduct. It is precisely the way in which these matters should be dealt with. To actually start parsing and talking about whether something is recorded in writing, make some process note, when we are actually talking here about something which was dealt with entirely appropriately and in detail, in full public gaze, just trivialises the whole process.</text>
        <text id="20151015b53f84f48ec245a690000381">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20151015b53f84f48ec245a690000382">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I call to order the members for Taylor, Chaffey, Newland, Stuart, Hartley and the leader, and I warn for the first time the members for Newland and Wright.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>