<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-10-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2919" />
  <endPage num="2990" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Annual Report 2014-15</name>
      <page num="2952" />
      <text id="201510143daad385799742bbb0000511">
        <heading>Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Annual Report 2014-15</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-10-14">
            <name>Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Annual Report 2014-15</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-10-14T14:45:14" />
        <text id="201510143daad385799742bbb0000512">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-14T14:45:14" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:45):</by>  A further supplementary: the Attorney-General's position is that unless he receives a specific complaint, and yesterday's ICAC report makes absolutely clear one in four are too scared to make a report, he is not going to progress the recommendation to impose a criminal offence and sanction on those who either interfere with or attempt to interfere with FOI processes.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Child Protection Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-10-14">
            <name>Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Annual Report 2014-15</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-10-14T14:45:42" />
        <text id="201510143daad385799742bbb0000513">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-14T14:45:42" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Child Protection Reform) (14:45):</by>  I did not say anything of the sort and I do not say anything of the sort. I was attempting to answer the earlier question, which unhelpfully contained additional material which was not contained in the original source document.</text>
        <text id="201510143daad385799742bbb0000514">What I am trying to say is that we are looking at all of those things. I am not ruling out the notion that there might be, if there is a demonstrated need for it, the inclusion of some offence. I do make the point that one should not, as a matter of good public policy, legislate to create criminal offences in circumstances where there is no evidence that the offending behaviour is occurring. I continue to have an open mind about this.</text>
        <text id="201510143daad385799742bbb0000515">We will continue to work these things through, but let's be very plain about this. At the time, we did make inquiries because we wanted to know, if it was going on, where it was going on and what we could do to stop it immediately, not just by legislating but also by all of the executive arm of government providing very clear instructions, which were also provided on a whole range of other issues arising from that report, if my memory serves me correctly. The point is that I am not ruling anything out, but we are looking at all of these issues.</text>
        <text id="201510143daad385799742bbb0000516">Whilst we are on whistleblowers, can I just make this point, too, because it is an important point. The whistleblowers legislation predates the ICAC legislation by decades. The whistleblowers legislation is, in one form or another, extant in all of the other Australian jurisdictions and has been reviewed in those jurisdictions from time to time.</text>
        <text id="201510143daad385799742bbb0000517">There is quite a degree of diversity around the country as to what whistleblowers legislation looks like, though there is the central core concept which is repeated. No other state has the equivalent of the Office for Public Integrity—a place to which you can go anonymously, make a report anonymously and have that report vetted and examined anonymously, without necessarily having to formally engage the provisions of the whistleblowers act.</text>
        <text id="201510143daad385799742bbb0000518">So, whilst I accept and agree that a review of the Whistleblowers Act is important and is something we are doing, lest anybody be mistaken about what the consequences of us not having done that completed yet might be, let's bear in mind that, since the Office for Public Integrity has been open, anybody with a complaint about maladministration, corruption or any of those other matters mentioned can just get in touch with OPI. They are completely protected and anonymous in respect of that, without having to necessarily engage the whistleblowers legislation.</text>
        <text id="201510143daad385799742bbb0000519">Just so it is clear, that does not mean we do not have to look at the whistleblowers legislation, but I am saying that they do have another alternative which does not exist in any other state in the commonwealth.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>