<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-10-13" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2831" />
  <endPage num="2917" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse</name>
      <text id="201510130ba8bd8119d04cfd90000747">
        <heading>Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-10-13">
            <name>Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-10-13T15:02:40" />
        <text id="201510130ba8bd8119d04cfd90000748">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-13T15:02:40" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (15:02):</by>  Supplementary to the Premier: given the Premier's commitment to the state inquiry and the importance of the victims telling their story and the therapeutic benefits of that, will he now require the Attorney-General to apologise to those who sought to still put their stories to the national inquiry, particularly those outside the terms of reference that were offered in the state inquiry?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-10-13">
            <name>Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-10-13T15:03:10" />
        <text id="201510130ba8bd8119d04cfd90000749">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-13T15:03:10" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (15:03):</by>  I think this is a misconstruction of the Attorney's remarks. The Attorney was responding to questions about whether he would agree to establish a new form of redress in the context of us already having established a state form of redress, and I do not think the construction that the honourable member is putting on his remarks is a fair one. I don't think I have anything I can add.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>