<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-09-23" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2627" />
  <endPage num="2724" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Land Tax</name>
      <text id="201509235657de78899144aeb0000461">
        <heading>Land Tax</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4342" kind="question">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Stuart</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-09-23">
            <name>Land Tax</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-09-23T14:50:30" />
        <text id="201509235657de78899144aeb0000462">
          <timeStamp time="2015-09-23T14:50:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN (Stuart) (14:50):</by>  Yes, my supplementary question to the Treasurer is: will he please explain to the house why he thinks there is no connection between the state's land tax revenue and the removal of stamp duty on commercial real property transactions?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Finance</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Small Business</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-09-23">
            <name>Land Tax</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-09-23T14:50:45" />
        <text id="201509235657de78899144aeb0000463">
          <timeStamp time="2015-09-23T14:50:45" />
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens—Treasurer, Minister for Finance, Minister for State Development, Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy, Minister for Small Business) (14:50):</by>  Wow! I am lost for words. I will explain this, and perhaps the two up-and-comers at the back—</text>
        <text id="201509235657de78899144aeb0000464">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="3124">Mr Pisoni interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201509235657de78899144aeb0000465">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Unley is called to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201509235657de78899144aeb0000466">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  —can explain this to—I even notice members of the gallery smiling. Conveyance duty is charged at transaction, so when a commercial property is transacted—</text>
        <text id="201509235657de78899144aeb0000467">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4847">Mr Knoll interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201509235657de78899144aeb0000468">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Schubert is warned for the second and final time.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201509235657de78899144aeb0000469">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  —there is a charge at the transaction point. If the member is saying that somehow we will allow a greater aggregation of properties because we are removing conveyance duty and people can therefore have multiple ownerships without paying a conveyance, it is true, but their land tax bills will be more substantial. If he is saying that people can disaggregate their properties because there is no conveyance, I am more than happy to go through this with the shadow minister about why we think the impacts will be minimal, given the rate of land tax that we charge in this state. </text>
        <page num="2660" />
        <text id="201509235657de78899144aeb0000470">I think he is fundamentally confused between what a conveyance duty is and what a land tax is. A conveyance duty is at the point of transaction. You do not pay an annualised conveyance duty; you pay an annualised land tax. They are two separate charges. I don't want to do damage to your leadership chances because I actually want you to succeed, because I pray every night you get it, but—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201509235657de78899144aeb0000471">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201509235657de78899144aeb0000472">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  Much as I would welcome you to this side of the house, I am not asking you to be the new leader, and nor should the Treasurer.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201509235657de78899144aeb0000473">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Yes, the Treasurer will address his remarks through the Chair.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201509235657de78899144aeb0000474">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  I think what the member is saying is: by removing conveyance duty, will there be greater disaggregation of properties, therefore ending multiple ownerships and therefore being able to move properties around to different ownerships to restructure their land tax liabilities? The Treasury have done some forecasts and that is relatively minor, but that was not the question. The member for Adelaide is struggling to understand what is actually going on, in that the member Stuart has just humiliated himself in front of the parliament.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201509235657de78899144aeb0000475">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  If the point of order from the member for Adelaide or the member for Unley is that the Treasurer was mistaken in referring to one of them, then they will be leaving the chamber for a bogus point of order. Do they still wish to make the point of order? Supplementary.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>