<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-09-10" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2457" />
  <endPage num="2553" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Stamp Duty Reform</name>
      <text id="20150910f254e941040b4391b0000854">
        <heading>Stamp Duty Reform</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-09-10">
            <name>Stamp Duty Reform</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-09-10T14:24:42" />
        <text id="20150910f254e941040b4391b0000855">
          <timeStamp time="2015-09-10T14:24:42" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:24):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Given today's statistics showing South Australia has the highest unemployment rate in the nation, will the Premier now take urgent measures to halt the jobs crisis by accelerating tax cuts to stamp duty to encourage South Australian businesses and to employ more people?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-09-10">
            <name>Stamp Duty Reform</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-09-10T14:25:07" />
        <page num="2509" />
        <text id="20150910f254e941040b4391b0000856">
          <timeStamp time="2015-09-10T14:25:07" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (14:25):</by>  This is accelerating the tax cuts that the opposition suggested would have no effect and would be of no benefit to the South Australian economy. We don't follow the chain of reasoning. The budget reply speech by the Leader of the Opposition is that our tax cuts will do nothing to assist the growth of the South Australian economy or create jobs, and now he suggests that we should accelerate those same cuts as a response to growing the economy. I think in the parlance of the political discourse that lacks coherence. That one idea does not—</text>
        <text id="20150910f254e941040b4391b0000857">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150910f254e941040b4391b0000858">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The Treasurer is warned, and the Minister for Health and the member for Taylor are called to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150910f254e941040b4391b0000859">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  What we will be doing is to accelerate the 10 economic priorities which represent the economic plan for South Australia. Indeed, just this week, in pursuit of one of the critical economic priorities, which is the internationalisation of the South Australian economy, we saw the decision to reach an agreement to pursue a $4 billion iron ore mine, with the potential to create in the order of 2,500 jobs in construction, as part of the agreement that was reached just this week, with further updates on that agreement to occur later this year.</text>
        <text id="20150910f254e941040b4391b0000860">We also saw a new $70 million agricultural park investment agreement reached just this week. Another critical economic priority, of course, is the economic priority about making South Australia the best place to do business in the nation. An important piece of information we received from the business community about that is that—</text>
        <text id="20150910f254e941040b4391b0000861">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="3124">Mr Pisoni interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Deputy Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150910f254e941040b4391b0000862">
          <by role="office">The DEPUTY SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Unley is warned.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150910f254e941040b4391b0000863">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —we should align our time zone to the Eastern States. That has been a regular demand of the business community to create the most competitive business environment. We've done the heavy lifting on the taxation side. The Treasurer has introduced a nation-leading budget which has already introduced important tax reforms from the date of the budget, which has taken South Australia, on some scales, from the highest taxing state to the lowest taxing state in the nation.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Marshall</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150910f254e941040b4391b0000864">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall:</by>  The highest in the nation.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150910f254e941040b4391b0000865">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  We've never accepted that characterisation, but on some methodology, the one that's preferred by the Leader of the Opposition, we have gone from the highest to the lowest in the nation. That gives us the capacity to tell a very persuasive story to businesses looking to set up business here in South Australia to create jobs here in South Australia. So we will be taking steps to accelerate the work that we're doing in relation to our 10 economic priorities. Rather than oppose our efforts to pursue those priorities, either come up with some of your own or get in behind ours.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>