<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-07-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2081" />
  <endPage num="2177" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Estimates Replies</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Renewal SA</name>
      <text id="20150729c4194885f983471f80001184">
        <inserted>
          <heading>Renewal SA</heading>
        </inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>In reply to Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-07-29">
            <name>Renewal SA</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20150729c4194885f983471f80001185">
          <inserted>In reply to <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition)</by> (17 July 2014).  (Estimates Committee A) (First Session)</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Child Protection Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-07-29">
            <name>Renewal SA</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20150729c4194885f983471f80001186">
          <inserted>
            <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Child Protection Reform):</by>  I have been provided the following advice:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20150729c4194885f983471f80001187">
          <inserted>Currently, Renewal SA has one property in the Industrial and Commercial Premises Scheme that is subject to an indemnity deed. The property is located at Dalgleish Street, West Thebarton and is occupied by Hospira Adelaide Pty Ltd (formerly Bresagen Pty Ltd).</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20150729c4194885f983471f80001188">
          <inserted>The acquisition, development and sale of the site located at OG Road, Felixtow (the former J P Morgan facility) was governed by an Indemnity Deed between the Hon Rob Lucas MLC (then Minister for Industry and Trade) and the Industrial and Commercial Premises Corporation (ICPC). </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20150729c4194885f983471f80001189">
          <inserted>The Indemnity Deed, dated 27 November 2001 provides within Clause 2.1 as follows:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20150729c4194885f983471f80001190">
          <inserted>'The Minister indemnifies ICPC against all claims suffered or incurred by, or brought, made or recovered by any person against, ICPC in connection with:</inserted>
        </text>
        <page num="2173" />
        <text id="20150729c4194885f983471f80001191">
          <item sublevel="2">
            <inserted>1.&amp;#x9;the sale of the Land, for a price less than the Actual Cost Price and costs incurred by ICPC in selling the Land (which includes break costs incurred by ICPC from SAFA as a consequence of the sale of the Land) provided that if at the time of sale, Completion of the Works has not occurred at a price determined in accordance with clause 3 of the Agreement to Lease as if at the date of sale Completion of the Works had occurred.'</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="20150729c4194885f983471f80001192">
          <inserted>As there was a shortfall between net sale proceeds and the loan against the property of approximately $2.8 million, Renewal SA (as the successor to the ICPC) sought reimbursement for this shortfall from the Minister for Manufacturing, Innovation and Trade in order to clear the loan balance against the property in accordance with Clause 2.1(l) of the Indemnity Deed outlined above.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>