<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-07-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2081" />
  <endPage num="2177" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Estimates Replies</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Residential Development Code</name>
      <page num="2170" />
      <text id="201507296cfde9114b3e469790001145">
        <inserted>
          <heading>Residential Development Code</heading>
        </inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4343" kind="question">
        <name>In reply to Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Morialta</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-07-29">
            <name>Residential Development Code</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="201507296cfde9114b3e469790001146">
          <inserted>In reply to <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER (Morialta)</by> (17 July 2014).  (Estimates Committee A) (First Session)</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Child Protection Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-07-29">
            <name>Residential Development Code</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="201507296cfde9114b3e469790001147">
          <inserted>
            <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Child Protection Reform):</by>  I have been provided the following advice:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201507296cfde9114b3e469790001148">
          <inserted>The Residential Development Code was introduced in 2009 to streamline the assessment process for home construction, home renovation and minor domestic outbuildings and structures.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201507296cfde9114b3e469790001149">
          <inserted>The Residential Development Code for dwelling additions and minor domestic outbuildings applies to residential developments generally, while the Code for new dwellings applies to areas determined by me as the Minister administering the <term>Development Act 1993</term>.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201507296cfde9114b3e469790001150">
          <inserted>A development that meets the criteria of the Residential Development Code must be approved by the relevant authority and apart from street setback requirements; no regard is necessarily given to the development plan.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201507296cfde9114b3e469790001151">
          <inserted>During the implementation process of the Code, explicit exemptions were made to where the Code would apply including where a referral to a statutory body, such as the Coastal Protection Board is required. Furthermore, councils were able to nominate other areas for exclusion from the determined areas such as interface areas with industrial land uses.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201507296cfde9114b3e469790001152">
          <inserted>As planning policy within development plans is evolving to address changing strategic directions and site circumstances, adjustments can be made to the determined areas of the Residential Development Code. Approximately 20 alterations, to either include or exclude areas, have been made to the determined areas since the Code was introduced in 2009.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201507296cfde9114b3e469790001153">
          <inserted>I am advised that the request from the Copper Coast Council is currently being reviewed by the Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure and while this is still to be finalised, an exemption to address coastal hazard issues would be a sound basis to review the determined area.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>