<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-07-02" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1991" />
  <endPage num="2079" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Road Network Charge</name>
      <text id="201507025770fcc022fb421da0000615">
        <heading>Road Network Charge</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-07-02">
            <name>Road Network Charge</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-07-02T14:40:47" />
        <text id="201507025770fcc022fb421da0000616">
          <timeStamp time="2015-07-02T14:40:47" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:40):</by>  Supplementary: can the Treasurer confirm then if any of the scoping study has been concluded, if that work has been concluded and provided to the government?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201507025770fcc022fb421da0000617">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Minister for Transport.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2015-07-02T14:41:06" />
        <text id="201507025770fcc022fb421da0000618">
          <timeStamp time="2015-07-02T14:41:06" />
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister Assisting the Minister for Planning, Minister Assisting the Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (14:41):</by>  I don't know if this is an ABBA film clip, sir, that we're filming here where she's asking the Treasurer a question and looking at me. Would you like me to answer this, or the Treasurer?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201507025770fcc022fb421da0000619">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I was just looking for a minister to answer it. Anyone may rise.</text>
        <text id="201507025770fcc022fb421da0000620">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201507025770fcc022fb421da0000621">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I call to order the member for Kavel, who has caused that outbreak of disorder.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="2032" />
        <text id="201507025770fcc022fb421da0000622">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER:</by>  Point of order: as ministers often point out, any minister can answer the question and speak on behalf cabinet. Can one of them please have a go?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201507025770fcc022fb421da0000623">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  That was probably a bogus point of order, but I will overlook it on this occasion. Minister for Transport.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201507025770fcc022fb421da0000624">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  Nonetheless, I'm happy to oblige, Mr Speaker. As I was saying in my previous answer, despite the interjections of the deputy leader when she said that that's not correct, it is indeed correct. There was a press release issued by her on 7 January 2014 when she said those exact same things, that she believed, she personally believed, that the introduction of tolls on heavy vehicles was something that would inevitably lead to the imposition of tolls on all vehicles in South Australia and that the South Australian Liberal Party would never support this in South Australia. Yet, 130 days later she snuck out a little article into <term>The Advertiser </term>saying that they have reversed their position and they now support a toll.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201507025770fcc022fb421da0000625">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  Point of order: if, as the minister says, a road network charge is not a toll then why is the minister only talking about tolls?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201507025770fcc022fb421da0000626">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The deputy leader will withdraw for the next half an hour for that impromptu speech under the guise of a point of order.</text>
        <text id="201507025770fcc022fb421da0000627">
          <term>The honourable member for Bragg having withdrawn from the chamber:</term>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Gardner</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201507025770fcc022fb421da0000628">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr Gardner:</by>  It could have been a supplementary.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201507025770fcc022fb421da0000629">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  It could have been a supplementary, as the member for Morialta interjects, if it were expressed to be a supplementary, but it didn't seem to be interrogative to me, it seemed to be a statement. Opposition?</text>
        <text id="201507025770fcc022fb421da0000630">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201507025770fcc022fb421da0000631">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  On my list it is the member for Goyder.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>