<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-07-01" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1901" />
  <endPage num="1989" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Rail Signal Failures</name>
      <text id="20150701feb0269b10c94dffb0000631">
        <heading>Rail Signal Failures</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4843" kind="question">
        <name>Mr WINGARD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Mitchell</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-07-01">
            <name>Rail Signal Failures</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-07-01T14:28:28" />
        <text id="20150701feb0269b10c94dffb0000632">
          <timeStamp time="2015-07-01T14:28:28" />
          <by role="member" id="4843">Mr WINGARD (Mitchell) (14:28):</by>  Given that half a billion dollars was spent on the rail revitalisation program, why did the government feel that signalling issues were not a key component of that as a safety factor to keep public transport users safe?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-07-01">
            <name>Rail Signal Failures</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-07-01T14:28:43" />
        <text id="20150701feb0269b10c94dffb0000633">
          <timeStamp time="2015-07-01T14:28:43" />
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister Assisting the Minister for Planning, Minister Assisting the Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (14:28):</by>  The content of the answer from the previous question would go some way to answering this current question. As I said, we are part way through a significant upgrade program of our rail network, and while some parts of the network have been improved, there are other parts of the network which have not yet been improved. Providing this additional money means that we can minimise the risk and chances of these sorts of service interruptions from occurring in the future.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>