<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-06-03" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1431" />
  <endPage num="1517" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection</name>
      <text id="20150603d465baa38e7c470fb0000440">
        <heading>Child Protection</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4340" kind="question">
        <name>Ms SANDERSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Adelaide</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-06-03">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-06-03T14:48:20" />
        <text id="20150603d465baa38e7c470fb0000441">
          <timeStamp time="2015-06-03T14:48:20" />
          <by role="member" id="4340">Ms SANDERSON (Adelaide) (14:48):</by>  How many other cases involving multiple notifications of child abuse have been closed with no action taken?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4622" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.E. CLOSE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education and Child Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-06-03">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-06-03T14:48:35" />
        <text id="20150603d465baa38e7c470fb0000442">
          <timeStamp time="2015-06-03T14:48:35" />
          <by role="member" id="4622">The Hon. S.E. CLOSE (Port Adelaide—Minister for Education and Child Development, Minister for the Public Sector) (14:48):</by>  I will just disentangle that. There are multiple notifications on many families; to find out how many I would have to take that on notice. There are notifications that are investigated and then closed and there are notifications that are not investigated because the case is already open, so I do not think your question could be answered by a single figure.</text>
        <text id="20150603d465baa38e7c470fb0000443">The reality is that there are, as I said, this year—last year it was 52,000 and this year it is going to be 60,000 phone calls that come in of notifications to the CARL line to say that there is an issue. A study was done in 2008 in South Australia that indicated about one in four children by the time they turn 18 will receive a notification. I do not believe that one in four children need to have either serious investigation or to be removed from their family. We are dealing with a large number of notifications, a large number of interactions, with families and a fortunately relatively small number of children who are actually in difficulty. Trying to create a system that identifies those and doesn't miss the ones who shouldn't be missed is challenging, but it is one that I am actively engaged in.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>