<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-06-02" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1359" />
  <endPage num="1429" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Education and Child Development Department</name>
      <text id="201506022ba65d89034f47ffa0000482">
        <heading>Education and Child Development Department</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4340" kind="question">
        <name>Ms SANDERSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Adelaide</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-06-02">
            <name>Education and Child Development Department</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-06-02T15:02:27" />
        <text id="201506022ba65d89034f47ffa0000483">
          <timeStamp time="2015-06-02T15:02:27" />
          <by role="member" id="4340">Ms SANDERSON (Adelaide) (15:02):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Education and Child Development. Has the minister reconsidered her department's employment conditions that require a driver's licence for a receptionist position or a job as a social worker at the Child Abuse Report Line call centre?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4622" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.E. CLOSE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education and Child Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-06-02">
            <name>Education and Child Development Department</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-06-02T15:02:47" />
        <text id="201506022ba65d89034f47ffa0000484">
          <timeStamp time="2015-06-02T15:02:47" />
          <by role="member" id="4622">The Hon. S.E. CLOSE (Port Adelaide—Minister for Education and Child Development, Minister for the Public Sector) (15:02):</by>  While not wanting to comment on the particular case that has been raised publicly, which I believe is being looked at by the management in the department, it is the case that frequently social workers in the department are required to undertake a multitude of roles, including being able to go out and assist a child who is in difficulty and needs immediate assistance. In fact, we will recall that part of the Coroner's report related to the need to be able to be responsive to a call that comes in and he was critical of the arrangements that were in place then and we have improved those arrangements subsequently.</text>
        <text id="201506022ba65d89034f47ffa0000485">In general practice I can completely understand why that is a requirement for social workers employed in the Public Service. However, I accept that we must constantly be vigilant about discrimination that is unnecessary and I will make sure that that particular case is looked at appropriately to see whether there is any latitude that would be able to be extended in that circumstance.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>