<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-05-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1285" />
  <endPage num="1358" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Repatriation General Hospital</name>
      <text id="201505147bf31ddf3a214cf290000595">
        <heading>Repatriation General Hospital</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3118" kind="question">
        <name>Mr GRIFFITHS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Goyder</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-05-14">
            <name>Repatriation General Hospital</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-05-14T14:51:15" />
        <text id="201505147bf31ddf3a214cf290000596">
          <timeStamp time="2015-05-14T14:51:15" />
          <by role="member" id="3118">Mr GRIFFITHS (Goyder) (14:51):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Regional Development. With the strength of opposition to the closure of the Repat Hospital expressed to you at a meeting that you attended at the Port Pirie RSL in March, will you join efforts being made calling for Ward 17 to be rebuilt on the site of Daw Park?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-05-14">
            <name>Repatriation General Hospital</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-05-14T14:51:33" />
        <text id="201505147bf31ddf3a214cf290000597">
          <timeStamp time="2015-05-14T14:51:33" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Minister for Health, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Health Industries) (14:51):</by>  There is a process—</text>
        <text id="201505147bf31ddf3a214cf290000598">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505147bf31ddf3a214cf290000599">
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING:</by>  Questions about the Repat go to the Minister for Health: I am the Minister for Health.</text>
        <text id="201505147bf31ddf3a214cf290000600">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505147bf31ddf3a214cf290000601">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  If members of the opposition continue to breach the invariable rules of the house about which minister can answer a question—namely, all of them—then they will be warned or ejected from the house. The Minister for Health.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="1328" />
        <text id="201505147bf31ddf3a214cf290000602">
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING:</by>  As I have said previously, we have a process in place. We have a working group, chaired by Dr Susan Neuhaus, who is the chair of the Repat Foundation, co-chaired by Professor Dorothy Keefe, eminent experts in post-traumatic stress disorder, representatives of the veterans' community, and Professor Sandy McFarlane, I think Australia's pre-eminent expert on post-traumatic stress. They are working through this issue. They are looking at what the model of care should be for sufferers of post-traumatic stress, and that will drive where the new Ward 17 will be.</text>
        <text id="201505147bf31ddf3a214cf290000603">Dr Neuhaus has said repeatedly that her advice to the government about where the new Ward 17 will be located will be driven by the model of care and not the other way around, because it is very, very important that we get the model of care right first and let that drive where the location of the new Ward 17 should be. It would be a mistake to compromise on the care of veterans because there had been a politically predetermined outcome as to the location of the new Ward 17.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>