<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-05-13" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1219" />
  <endPage num="1284" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Federal Budget</name>
      <text id="201505130202a37e722547dd80000357">
        <heading>Federal Budget</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-05-13">
            <name>Federal Budget</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-05-13T14:30:18" />
        <text id="201505130202a37e722547dd80000358">
          <timeStamp time="2015-05-13T14:30:18" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:30):</by>  My question is to the Treasurer. When the Treasurer claimed last night, and I quote, 'The Torrens Junction upgrade pushed out another year by Joe Hockey,' was he aware that the South Australian government had negotiated the delay?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505130202a37e722547dd80000359">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I will be listening very intently to this answer.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Finance</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Small Business</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2015-05-13T14:30:40" />
        <text id="201505130202a37e722547dd80000360">
          <timeStamp time="2015-05-13T14:30:40" />
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens—Treasurer, Minister for Finance, Minister for State Development, Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy, Minister for Small Business) (14:30):</by>  This is not the Torrens to Torrens project, sir, it is the Torrens Junction project; it is a different project, have no fear, Mr Speaker.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505130202a37e722547dd80000361">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Still of great concern to the state district of Croydon.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505130202a37e722547dd80000362">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  It is, sir, as to the people of West Torrens, Mr Speaker. The MYEFO released by Treasurer Hockey at the last update showed $232 million being spent in the year 2015-16. The previous 2014-15 budget showed $232 million being spent in 2015-16. We had an arrangement with the commonwealth government where we were going to spend our money first on the Goodwood Junction, and then they would give us the money to profile the Torrens Junction work as the government saw fit because we had spent our money in advance on their rail line.</text>
        <text id="201505130202a37e722547dd80000363">A spreadsheet from some junior official in DPTI is not government negotiation. We had an arrangement with the commonwealth government that was endorsed in previous budgets and the MYEFO and it was changed without consultation with the state government. The federal Treasurer was in Adelaide just last week saying he wanted to invest in infrastructure-ready, shovel-ready pieces of infrastructure, and what does he do? He pushes Darlington out by $30 million without even an explanation and then he reprofiles Torrens Junction. Why? No explanation, and then claims it was all our idea. Minister Mullighan and minister Briggs were fully aware that this government was ready to go in 2015-16. We had an arrangement in place, we had spent money on a rail track owned by the commonwealth in advance and they have reneged yet again.</text>
        <text id="201505130202a37e722547dd80000364">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505130202a37e722547dd80000365">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Excuse me, Treasurer. The member for Unley is suspended for the next hour under sessional orders.</text>
        <text id="201505130202a37e722547dd80000366">
          <term>The honourable member for Unley having withdrawn from the chamber:</term>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="1246" />
        <text id="201505130202a37e722547dd80000367">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  It just reinforces the fact that last year assistant minister Briggs issued a press release trumpeting the massive infrastructure spend in South Australia. This year, silence. Not a single project in South Australia—$5 billion in the north of the country but not half a billion in the north of Adelaide. I have to say, when the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition and assistant minister Briggs stand by the side of South Road and say, 'Let's do the entire north-south corridor within a decade,' yet in this budget, not a dollar—not a dollar for South Road extra. In fact, not a dollar extra for any infrastructure projects improving ports, rail or road. Nothing.</text>
        <text id="201505130202a37e722547dd80000368">So don't come in here and lecture us about being an infrastructure government. We are the ones who are spending money on infrastructure: the O-Bahn upgrade, the most patronised piece of public transport infrastructure anywhere in the state, and we are upgrading it. We are upgrading roads, Torrens to Torrens—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505130202a37e722547dd80000369">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER:</by>  Point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505130202a37e722547dd80000370">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Point of order, member for Morialta.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505130202a37e722547dd80000371">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER:</by>  Under standing order 98, the minister is debating and he has gone a long way from this question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505130202a37e722547dd80000372">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I uphold the point of order.</text>
        <text id="201505130202a37e722547dd80000373">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1805">Mr Goldsworthy interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505130202a37e722547dd80000374">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Was that the member for Kavel interjecting again?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4342" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr van Holst Pellekaan</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505130202a37e722547dd80000375">
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr van Holst Pellekaan:</by>  He was talking about infrastructure, sir.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505130202a37e722547dd80000376">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  He was, after a manner. The deputy leader.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>