<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-05-07" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1077" />
  <endPage num="1151" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection</name>
      <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000514">
        <heading>Child Protection</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-05-07">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-05-07T14:37:30" />
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000515">
          <timeStamp time="2015-05-07T14:37:30" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:37):</by>  Supplementary, again to the Minister for Child Protection Reform: is the minister seriously telling the house that he is not aware that Commissioner Nyland has not only been asked about but, according to his own colleague in the cabinet, is now considering the issue of the appointment of a commissioner and what powers he or she should have?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-05-07">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-05-07T14:37:55" />
        <page num="1115" />
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000516">
          <timeStamp time="2015-05-07T14:37:55" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (14:37):</by>  I think we are going to have to do this the long way. Mr Speaker, three weeks—</text>
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000517">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000518">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Yes, that's right. Three weeks after coming into government, this government commenced the Layton review, the most thoroughgoing review of child protection in the history of this state. That is because we had, in the lead-up to the election, a government that refused to accept that there was a crisis in child protection. Indeed, they sought to censor key advisers that were seeking to send them that message. That was the starting point we had—an impoverished child protection system.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000519">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  Point of order: I asked a specific question.</text>
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000520">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. Weatherill interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000521">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  Can you just sit down while I make the point of order, thank you?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000522">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The deputy leader is already on two warnings. Will she state the point of order succinctly?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000523">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  Yes, sir.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000524">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  And what is the standing order?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000525">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  The question was very specific.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000526">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  No, what is the standing order?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000527">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  98. The question was very specific as to what was the knowledge of the Attorney-General in respect of the terms of reference for the royal commission, not the historical contribution that the Premier is now outlining. It was nothing to do with the—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000528">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I will wait to hear what the Premier has to say. Premier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000529">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  In her report, one of Robyn Layton's recommendations was the creation of a children's commissioner, specifically excluding the powers of investigation, because a further recommendation of hers was the creation of a health and community services ombudsman, which scoped in child protection complaints. So that was the place we went to investigate complaints concerning child protection. Of course, we adopted that measure.</text>
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000530">Also, instead of including the children's commissioner, we changed the role of two bodies: the Child Protection Advisory Council and also the Children's Interest Bureau. We collapsed them down into one body called the Council for the Care and Protection of Children, which had advocacy powers on behalf of children very similar to the sorts of things recommended by Robyn Layton. In effect we created a very similar body which did many of the things that Robyn Layton suggested that a children's commissioner should do.</text>
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000531">However, we have been persuaded to introduce a separate children's commissioner à la the Robyn Layton model. The reason it is not law is because those opposite resisted it, and they have introduced a model—</text>
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000532">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000533">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Premier, will you be seated. For almost half of question time I have allowed the leader to interject almost constantly. I would like to ask him to stop, because standing order  131 states that a member may not interrupt another member who is speaking. Standing order 142 states that when a member is speaking no-one may make a noise or disturbance or converse aloud.</text>
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000534">
          <event kind="interjection">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000535">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  My tolerance is at an end. The Premier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="1116" />
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000536">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  The model we have proposed differs materially in that the investigative powers are not included, and I note that other states and territories have not adopted this investigative model for the commissioner for children. Then, of course, fast forward to the conversations the current minister has had with her counterpart in the upper house, and she puts a sensible proposition—which was not cavilled with—that we should await the outcome of the commissioner's recommendations, because these matters can be put before the commissioner and a sensible recommendation made.</text>
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000537">Why on earth would you not accept that proposition? I will tell why you would not: if someone who was deeply affected by these matters decides to approach you and says that this should be advanced, the children's commissioner should be advanced with investigative powers, and you decide to stand up next to them at a news conference to get a cheap, political point. That is where we are today. It is a disgrace —</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000538">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER:</by>  Point of order. The minister is clearly straying a long way from the historical chronology that you previously allowed, and is clearly debating the issue by characterising other members' conduct.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000539">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Yes; there is an element of debate in the Premier's utterances. The Premier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000540">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Can I say that there is no way forward in this difficult issue of child protection without a measure of bipartisanship and a measure of calm, sensible reasoning. That is why we have a royal commission. We can all resist the opportunity to make cheap, political points in this incredibly vexed area of child protection, where all there is—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3121" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Pengilly</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000541">
          <by role="member" id="3121">Mr Pengilly:</by>  Will you please answer the question?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000542">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Finniss is called to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505072ffce98dfd194c8db0000543">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —is a morass of very difficult decisions that are made by conscientious public servants. What we want them to be doing is making brave, conscientious decisions and not worrying that every time they actually make a judgement they might be hauled up and ridiculed in the public sphere. These are incredibly difficult issues, and we need people to make fine judgements and we need to back them then. We also need to attract the best and brightest to these roles in seeking to make what are incredibly difficult and vexed decisions.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>