<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-05-06" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="989" />
  <endPage num="1075" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Parliamentary Committees</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Public Works Committee: 2 Second Avenue, Mawson Lakes</name>
      <page num="992" />
      <text id="201505064747afeddbd14af0a0000047">
        <heading>Public Works Committee: 2 Second Avenue, Mawson Lakes</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4838" kind="speech">
        <name>Ms DIGANCE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Elder</electorate>
        <startTime time="2015-05-06T11:17:04" />
        <text id="201505064747afeddbd14af0a0000048">
          <timeStamp time="2015-05-06T11:17:04" />
          <by role="member" id="4838">Ms DIGANCE (Elder) (11:17):</by>  I move:</text>
        <text id="201505064747afeddbd14af0a0000049">
          <inserted>That the 515<sup>th</sup> report of the committee, entitled 2 Second Avenue, Mawson Lakes, be noted.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="201505064747afeddbd14af0a0000050">Renewal SA owns the property located at 2 Second Avenue, Mawson Lakes. They have negotiated a long-term lease with Codan (namely, a 15-year lease, with the right to renew for a further 10 years). In order to facilitate a lease, Renewal SA was aware that they would need to upgrade the facility to an acceptable standard. They have agreed to the following works:</text>
        <text id="201505064747afeddbd14af0a0000051">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">base building works;</item>
        </text>
        <text id="201505064747afeddbd14af0a0000052">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">fit-out works to a maximum of $6 million (the lessee will contribute the remaining funds to meet their own requirements);</item>
        </text>
        <text id="201505064747afeddbd14af0a0000053">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">construction of a new building; and</item>
        </text>
        <text id="201505064747afeddbd14af0a0000054">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">civil works to facilitate semitrailer entry and egress from the site in a single direction.</item>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="201505064747afeddbd14af0a0000055">Details of the exact works are included in the committee's report and the agency's submission. These works will ensure the facility meets the Building Code of Australia requirements, complies with the requirements of the Disability Discrimination Act, and meets a minimum 4-star NABERS energy rating.</text>
        <text id="201505064747afeddbd14af0a0000056">The cost of construction is estimated at $17.977 million (GST exclusive) and the total gross rental over the initial 15-year lease period is anticipated to be in the order of $46 million (GST exclusive).</text>
        <text id="201505064747afeddbd14af0a0000057">Works are due to commence in July 2015, with the completion next year in February. Given this, and pursuant to section 12C of the Parliamentary Committees Act 1991, the Public Works Committee reports to parliament that it recommends the proposed public works.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3121" kind="speech">
        <name>Mr PENGILLY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Finniss</electorate>
        <startTime time="2015-05-06T11:18:49" />
        <text id="201505064747afeddbd14af0a0000058">
          <timeStamp time="2015-05-06T11:18:49" />
          <by role="member" id="3121">Mr PENGILLY (Finniss) (11:18):</by>  The opposition members again supported this project. It was interesting to listen to the information that was supplied to the committee on the day. We asked some questions about why Renewal SA were spending the money on upgrading this facility that was formerly used, and why indeed the company that has taken over the lease of the building is not doing it themselves. I found that the answers were satisfactory, but questioned to some extent why this happened anyway.</text>
        <text id="201505064747afeddbd14af0a0000059">My view is that the government may well have been told that if they did not pay through Renewal SA, the company would have gone interstate and taken its employees with it and we would have had nothing. We never quite drilled down to the bottom of that one; however, the project will be a good project. It is a substantial upgrade, which of course, for that amount of money, it has to be, but for the benefit of South Australia we supported the project.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4339" kind="speech">
        <name>Mr WHETSTONE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Chaffey</electorate>
        <startTime time="2015-05-06T11:20:16" />
        <text id="201505064747afeddbd14af0a0000060">
          <timeStamp time="2015-05-06T11:20:16" />
          <by role="member" id="4339">Mr WHETSTONE (Chaffey) (11:20):</by>  I too rise to support this project. As the Chair and the member for Finniss have explained, the Renewal SA project at Second Avenue Mawson Lakes is certainly an interesting project. Essentially, the project has been described as looking to leverage and exploit the maximum potential out of those facilities that we have within Technology Park. Codan Limited is the tenant that entered into an agreement with Renewal SA, and the proposal will see Codan relocate to Technology Park from Newton with up to 250 employees.</text>
        <text id="201505064747afeddbd14af0a0000061">I share the member for Finniss's sentiments as to whether there was an ultimatum or deal put to government to entice them to Technology Park. They are currently operating out of a number of different facilities. This facility and this development will enable them to amalgamate operations into that one location.</text>
        <page num="993" />
        <text id="201505064747afeddbd14af0a0000062">The building was constructed in three stages, firstly in 1995, then 1997, and then 2000. It has always been used for technology and advanced research type activities, but initially it was constructed for telecommunications company Motorola, as many of you would know. They subsequently left occupation of the premises in 2008 and since then BAE occupied the facility. BAE then left at the end of 2013 and, at that stage, we put the building in the hands of a commercial agent who undertook a national marketing campaign and then three months later brought forward Codan as a potential tenant.</text>
        <text id="201505064747afeddbd14af0a0000063">The concerns that I have are around the fact that this is a significant investment of about $17 million that is simply for a relocation, and it seems the government has a bigger defence and technology picture in the project. Renewal SA will be providing significant upgrades to the current offices previously used by BAE, but we as the opposition supported this project and we see it as a bigger picture within the defence industries here in South Australia.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4838" kind="speech">
        <name>Ms DIGANCE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Elder</electorate>
        <startTime time="2015-05-06T11:22:49" />
        <text id="201505064747afeddbd14af0a0000064">
          <timeStamp time="2015-05-06T11:22:49" />
          <by role="member" id="4838">Ms DIGANCE (Elder) (11:22):</by>  I thank my fellow Public Works Committee members, the member for Chaffey and the member for Finniss, for their contributions, and I appreciate the work of all other committee members and also the executive and administrative officers of the Public Works Committee and all those witnesses who presented. I appreciate the bipartisan support for this project.</text>
        <text id="201505064747afeddbd14af0a0000065">Motion carried.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>