<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-05-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="911" />
  <endPage num="987" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>SA Pathology</name>
      <text id="201505052162c3aabdb540b2b0001039">
        <inserted>
          <heading>SA Pathology</heading>
        </inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4342" kind="question">
        <name>In reply to Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Stuart</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-05-05">
            <name>SA Pathology</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="201505052162c3aabdb540b2b0001040">
          <inserted>In reply to <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN (Stuart)</by> (11 February 2015).  </inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-05-05">
            <name>SA Pathology</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="201505052162c3aabdb540b2b0001041">
          <inserted>
            <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Minister for Health, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Health Industries):</by>  Ernst &amp; Young had been commissioned to evaluate and assess whether pathology services were being delivered efficiently and consistently across South Australia.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201505052162c3aabdb540b2b0001042">
          <inserted>Their review outlined six recommendations to improve the service's business performance, including exploring the option of contesting pathology services in regional areas.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201505052162c3aabdb540b2b0001043">
          <inserted>I would like to clarify that the recommendation does not propose that the Government outsource or privatise regional pathology services. It merely suggests that the Government evaluate the opportunity.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201505052162c3aabdb540b2b0001044">
          <inserted>On 12 February, 2015, I announced that the State Government has ruled out this recommendation. Based on the feedback received it was apparent that this recommendation should not proceed and will not be considered as part of a final response to the review.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201505052162c3aabdb540b2b0001045">
          <inserted>A number of regional communities expressed concerns about the potential change to their local SA Pathology services. These high quality and efficient pathology diagnostic services are integral to the workings of country hospitals and are greatly valued by country communities.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201505052162c3aabdb540b2b0001046">
          <inserted>The Government's response to the remaining five recommendations will be released once the consultation feedback has been considered and evaluated.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>