<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-05-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="911" />
  <endPage num="987" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection</name>
      <text id="201505056b0c4d3d9845430780000543">
        <heading>Child Protection</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-05-05">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-05-05T15:14:02" />
        <text id="201505056b0c4d3d9845430780000544">
          <timeStamp time="2015-05-05T15:14:02" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (15:14):</by>  Can the minister provide any explanation to the parliament as to why staff were not informed of their obligations and, in fact, their opportunities under the current law?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Child Protection Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-05-05">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-05-05T15:14:22" />
        <text id="201505056b0c4d3d9845430780000545">
          <timeStamp time="2015-05-05T15:14:22" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Child Protection Reform) (15:14):</by>  One presumes, and one works on the basis I think, that public servants are conducting themselves in a way which is in accordance with the law until one has reason to believe to the contrary.</text>
        <text id="201505056b0c4d3d9845430780000546">My understanding is that we had a proposition put to us by the Coroner that he felt, whether it was lawful or otherwise, there was an incorrect focus on the way people were dealing with these issues of privacy, and that in some circumstances, the balance between privacy and, in effect, not respecting privacy in order to protect a child was not being correctly balanced. He said he wanted a recommendation to be heard loud and clear by the department that, when that balance is in play, you always err on the side of the child, not on the side of privacy, and that—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Marshall</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505056b0c4d3d9845430780000547">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall:</by>  But he said they didn't know what their opportunities were.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505056b0c4d3d9845430780000548">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  And that is what has been directed to the department. I am advised, as I said in the ministerial statement, that that is what I am advised. This is what I am told:</text>
        <text id="201505056b0c4d3d9845430780000549">
          <inserted>…the Chief Executive of the Department for Education and Child Development has issued a direction to all Families SA staff that the paramount consideration must always be the wellbeing and welfare of children. The direction specified that considerations of confidentiality must give way in the face of the primary objective of child safety.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>