<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-05-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="911" />
  <endPage num="987" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Departmental Random Drug Testing</name>
      <text id="201505051b6b1257a786419080000500">
        <heading>Departmental Random Drug Testing</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-05-05">
            <name>Departmental Random Drug Testing</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-05-05T15:06:49" />
        <text id="201505051b6b1257a786419080000501">
          <timeStamp time="2015-05-05T15:06:49" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (15:06):</by>  My supplementary is to the Minister for Education and Child Development. Can the minister update us on the practice of random drug testing within her department?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Child Protection Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-05-05">
            <name>Departmental Random Drug Testing</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-05-05T15:07:06" />
        <page num="946" />
        <text id="201505051b6b1257a786419080000502">
          <timeStamp time="2015-05-05T15:07:06" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Child Protection Reform) (15:07):</by>  Mr Speaker, can I just make this point? If the Leader of the Opposition has some particular proposition to advance and then asks whether or not something has been done in accordance with whatever it is, that's fine. I am happy to take his—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Gardner</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505051b6b1257a786419080000503">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr Gardner:</by>  The CEO said it was happening. We want to know about it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505051b6b1257a786419080000504">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  The member for Morialta has helpfully added one tiny little bit of information which wasn't available in the first place, which is it is something to do with something that was said by the chief executive officer, I assume before one of the upper house committees; would that be right?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Gardner</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505051b6b1257a786419080000505">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr Gardner:</by>  That's what he said a minute ago.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505051b6b1257a786419080000506">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Let me have—</text>
        <text id="201505051b6b1257a786419080000507">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4343">Mr Gardner interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505051b6b1257a786419080000508">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Morialta will withdraw and apologise for that remark.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505051b6b1257a786419080000509">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER:</by>  I withdraw and apologise, sir.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505051b6b1257a786419080000510">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Morialta is warned a second and final time, the member for Schubert is warned a first time and the member for Hartley is called to order. Does the Deputy Premier have anything more to add?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201505051b6b1257a786419080000511">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Only this. Far be it from me to offer suggestions as to how people might frame a question, but it is conventional, as far as I know, that when you have some proposition advanced by somebody that you wish the government to agree with, disagree with or comment on, the conventional way of doing it would be to say, 'On whatever day before whatever committee, Mr Bloggs said X, Y and Z. Apropos of this thing, what is going on with X, Y and Z?' rather than to eliminate the first bit (which provides some sort of context and some sort of point of relevance) and ask a question that could mean anything. I think the best thing I can possibly do is invite the Leader of the Opposition to provide, in due course, some particulars of whatever it is he is talking about and I would be happy to find out.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>