<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-03-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="833" />
  <endPage num="910" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Compulsory Third-Party Insurance</name>
      <text id="20150326e69bdf5d16a84822b0000542">
        <heading>Compulsory Third-Party Insurance</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-03-26">
            <name>Compulsory Third-Party Insurance</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-03-26T15:10:16" />
        <text id="20150326e69bdf5d16a84822b0000543">
          <timeStamp time="2015-03-26T15:10:16" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (15:10):</by>  Supplementary: will there be any ongoing regulatory role from the state government's perspective with regard to CTP insurance premiums?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Finance</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Small Business</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-03-26">
            <name>Compulsory Third-Party Insurance</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-03-26T15:10:24" />
        <text id="20150326e69bdf5d16a84822b0000544">
          <timeStamp time="2015-03-26T15:10:24" />
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens—Treasurer, Minister for Finance, Minister for State Development, Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy, Minister for Small Business) (15:10):</by>  That is actually a very good question: will there be a very high level of regulatory oversight in this? The government is contemplating this, and we will make sure that there is a high level of regulatory oversight. The important thing about allowing this bit to be open to the private sector for competition is, if you don't have strong oversight and strong regulation, you can get outcomes that are not necessarily beneficial to consumers. But there is nothing that says that strong regulation and private interaction can't work and work well and give a good outcome, not only for those who regulate, but those who we seek to regulate.</text>
        <text id="20150326e69bdf5d16a84822b0000545">I think what we are going to see here is a good outcome for consumers, who will be given more choice. That is a good thing. We want to offer families choice of their insurance provider and we want to make sure that there is strong regulation there to protect families from increasing costs. It is an important part of the privatisation of the Motor Accident Commission, and I will look forward to bringing more information to the house as we get to a solution closer to 1 July 2016, or sooner, depending on when the final transition occurs.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>