<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-03-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="833" />
  <endPage num="910" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Emergency Departments</name>
      <text id="20150326b3c807725012409890000457">
        <heading>Emergency Departments</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-03-26">
            <name>Emergency Departments</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-03-26T14:51:00" />
        <text id="20150326b3c807725012409890000458">
          <timeStamp time="2015-03-26T14:51:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:51):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Health. Will medical and surgical training opportunities be reduced as a result of the government's downgrades of emergency departments?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-03-26">
            <name>Emergency Departments</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-03-26T14:51:11" />
        <page num="870" />
        <text id="20150326b3c807725012409890000459">
          <timeStamp time="2015-03-26T14:51:11" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Minister for Health, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Health Industries) (14:51):</by>  I welcome the opposition's sudden interest in training positions for medical staff in our hospitals. It is something on which they have been strangely silent. Of course, we will work with universities and medical colleges to ensure that we continue training health professionals across our health system, whether they be nurses, whether they be medical staff.</text>
        <text id="20150326b3c807725012409890000460">There is one thing which has happened which I cannot help, but perhaps the opposition could help me if they had a bit of backbone. Last year, the federal government cut the PGPPP scheme, the scheme whereby the federal government provides funding to provide training places. Where do these training places predominantly go? Somewhere I would have thought members of the opposition, if they were really interested in regional South Australia, something they would be particularly interested in, because these training positions—</text>
        <text id="20150326b3c807725012409890000461">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150326b3c807725012409890000462">
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING:</by>  The member for Mount Gambier may be the exception to the rule in the opposition. He is someone who is in touch with his community. The simple fact is the Abbott government cut PGPPP funding which predominantly provides training places in regional South Australia to ensure we have a pipeline of medical practitioners who will go and work in regional South Australia. We have enormous challenges coming up in terms of an adequate medical workforce in regional South Australia and PGPPP provided training opportunities in rural areas because we know that practitioners who have done their training in rural areas are likely to continue a career in those rural areas. It is absolutely critical—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150326b3c807725012409890000463">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL:</by>  Point of order, Mr Speaker: I ask that you instruct the minister to return to the substance of the question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150326b3c807725012409890000464">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  No, I disagree with the leader. I think the Minister for Health is being germane. The leader asked the question and now the minister is answering it, but I do thank you for the pause during which I can call to order the members for Schubert and Heysen, the deputy leader and the member for Chaffey. I warn the member for Heysen the first time. None of those arise from the opposition's merciless heckling of the Premier on the first Dorothy. The minister.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150326b3c807725012409890000465">
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING:</by>  The PGPPP scheme has been very important to ensure that in regional South Australia we have a pipeline of medical practitioners willing to go out and do the work in those rural areas where sometimes it can be extremely hard to recruit a general practitioner. What did the Abbott government do? Cut it. Simply cut it. I would have thought that an opposition seriously interested in health, and particularly interested in looking after—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150326b3c807725012409890000466">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER:</by>  Point of order, Mr Speaker: the minister is debating. This is absolutely nothing to do with reduction of places in emergency departments, particularly when he starts talking about what he would have thought an opposition would or would not do.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150326b3c807725012409890000467">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  We do have a federal government, and the minister is allowed, in answering, to criticise a decision of the federal government. Perhaps the minister could move on from tying the state opposition to that federal government.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150326b3c807725012409890000468">
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING:</by>  I would simply say, Mr Speaker, that if the Liberal Party were serious about training positions in health in our state they would have said something when the federal government cut the PGPPP scheme last year.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150326b3c807725012409890000469">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I specifically asked the minister not to do that, so I uphold the member for Morialta's point of order. The member for Napier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1802" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. P. Caica</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150326b3c807725012409890000470">
          <by role="member" id="1802">The Hon. P. Caica:</by>  What a shame; we wanted another one of your questions, Steven.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150326b3c807725012409890000471">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Colton is called to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1802" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. P. Caica</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150326b3c807725012409890000472">
          <by role="member" id="1802">The Hon. P. Caica:</by>  Sorry, sir.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>