<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-03-25" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="763" />
  <endPage num="831" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Rail Electrification Project</name>
      <text id="20150325a3a925abb6c242bf90000534">
        <heading>Rail Electrification Project</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4843" kind="question">
        <name>Mr WINGARD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Mitchell</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-03-25">
            <name>Rail Electrification Project</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-03-25T15:03:03" />
        <text id="20150325a3a925abb6c242bf90000535">
          <timeStamp time="2015-03-25T15:03:03" />
          <by role="member" id="4843">Mr WINGARD (Mitchell) (15:03):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Transport. Given the recommendations of the independent review of the Adelaide electrification in June 2012 after the state Labor government cancelled the Gawler rail electrification project, was a new master plan for the upgrade of the rail network established?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-03-25">
            <name>Rail Electrification Project</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-03-25T15:03:25" />
        <page num="800" />
        <text id="20150325a3a925abb6c242bf90000536">
          <timeStamp time="2015-03-25T15:03:25" />
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister Assisting the Minister for Planning, Minister Assisting the Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (15:03):</by>  I thank the member for Mitchell for his interest in this matter. Perhaps I will provide a bit of background to the house. In 2012 a report was procured by the department into the electrification project, principally of the Noarlunga line which, of course, has been extended out to Seaford. That is not an uncommon thing to do. It is not uncommon that external advice would be sought for major projects of this nature. In 2012, if I recall rightly, due to the declining revenues which the state was suffering, a decision was made to postpone the Gawler rail electrification project.</text>
        <text id="20150325a3a925abb6c242bf90000537">Casting our minds back a little earlier than that, in 2008 the government first announced the electrification of our rail network, and it was made very clear at that point in time that the Noarlunga line would be the first line to be electrified, followed by the Gawler line and then subsequent lines, such as the Outer Harbor line, after that. This was for good reason: there had been a massive increase in residents living south of Noarlunga in the past few years, which of course meant that more services would be required to the southern suburbs.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="interjection">
        <name>Ms Redmond</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150325a3a925abb6c242bf90000538">
          <by role="member" id="1813">Ms Redmond:</by>  Not a high priority.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150325a3a925abb6c242bf90000539">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  That is a sentiment which—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150325a3a925abb6c242bf90000540">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Heysen is warned for the second and final time.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150325a3a925abb6c242bf90000541">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  The member for Heysen might be interested to know that they are not necessarily my words. They are the words of the member for Bragg which were uttered in 2012, outlining the necessity of these sorts of transport projects to service—</text>
        <text id="20150325a3a925abb6c242bf90000542">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="3119">The Hon. T.R. Kenyon interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150325a3a925abb6c242bf90000543">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Newland is called to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150325a3a925abb6c242bf90000544">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  —to service the southern suburbs. Not only did we commit to electrifying the Noarlunga line, extending it by 5.7 kilometres out to Seaford, including building a 1.1 kilometre rail bridge, we also committed to duplicating the Southern Expressway to make sure that these burgeoning areas of our metropolitan city were best serviced.</text>
        <text id="20150325a3a925abb6c242bf90000545">We have made it clear since then, most particularly in the budget that was released, if I recall, in June of last year, that we would be recommencing works on the Gawler line with funding. Off the top of my head, I think it's $60 million to be provided in the 2017-18 year.</text>
        <text id="20150325a3a925abb6c242bf90000546">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150325a3a925abb6c242bf90000547">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  If the leader likes to take exception to this fact, then I would urge him to pick up the phone, call his good mate Christopher Pyne and try to convince him to reinvest in public transport infrastructure because it is current federal and state Liberal Party policy not to invest in public transport infrastructure—not to invest at all.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150325a3a925abb6c242bf90000548">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4847">
        <name>Mr KNOLL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150325a3a925abb6c242bf90000549">
          <by role="member" id="4847">Mr KNOLL:</by>  The minister is not responsible for the policy of the opposition.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150325a3a925abb6c242bf90000550">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I will listen carefully to the minister.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150325a3a925abb6c242bf90000551">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  We consistently see an absolute refusal from both state Liberals as well now as federal Liberals to improve public transport infrastructure and, under those circumstances, we need to make sure that we cut our cloth appropriately. We have made it very clear that we want to deliver a public transport upgrade, for example, for the O-Bahn project, for—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Marshall</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150325a3a925abb6c242bf90000552">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall:</by>  Like the Outer Harbor line. How's that going? That was a promise.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150325a3a925abb6c242bf90000553">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  Well, we are very passionate about the Outer Harbor line because some of us live down that part of Adelaide. It's not just an inconvenient extra five or seven minutes to tow our yachts through. We will continue upgrading the electrification of our rail lines over time when funds provide but, when we've got a South Australian Liberal Party with members both in this parliament and also federally who don't believe in public transport investment, it means we need to go it alone.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>