<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-03-25" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="763" />
  <endPage num="831" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Oil and Gas Sector</name>
      <text id="20150325a4ab7a560440406aa0000458">
        <heading>Oil and Gas Sector</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4342" kind="question">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Stuart</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-03-25">
            <name>Oil and Gas Sector</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-03-25T14:49:00" />
        <text id="20150325a4ab7a560440406aa0000459">
          <timeStamp time="2015-03-25T14:49:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN (Stuart) (14:49):</by>  My question is again to the Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy. Can the minister explain why a strictly confidential internal departmental assessment was made and a draft letter approving a variation to Ambassador Exploration's work plan for PEL570 was sent to Ambassador's managing director before Ambassador had made an application for the variation? An email which was sent to Mr Barry Goldstein, who the minister referred to before, on 1 February 2013, one week before Ambassador lodged their application for variation to their work plan, says, and I quote:</text>
        <text id="20150325a4ab7a560440406aa0000460">
          <inserted>When you came to me on Friday last week, in strict confidence I was asked to score the proposed work programme using the bid assessment score sheet with published criteria…</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20150325a4ab7a560440406aa0000461">Staff member—and I will leave that person's name out—</text>
        <text continued="true" id="20150325a4ab7a560440406aa0000462">
          <inserted>was not available and you needed an answer that evening. The work programme was scored as per the standard methodology.</inserted>
        </text>
        <page num="796" />
        <text continued="true" id="20150325a4ab7a560440406aa0000463">Can the minister explain why that work was done, assessing the application before the application is lodged?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Finance</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Small Business</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-03-25">
            <name>Oil and Gas Sector</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-03-25T14:50:26" />
        <text id="20150325a4ab7a560440406aa0000464">
          <timeStamp time="2015-03-25T14:50:26" />
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens—Treasurer, Minister for Finance, Minister for State Development, Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy, Minister for Small Business) (14:50):</by>  I will have to get a detailed answer from the department, but I can only assume it is in a bid to reduce red tape.</text>
        <text id="20150325a4ab7a560440406aa0000465">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150325a4ab7a560440406aa0000466">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  So, I don't know why that occurred, but I suspect that's probably what it is. I think the mocking from members opposite of our hardworking and diligent public officials, who administer our petroleum exploration licenses—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Marshall</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150325a4ab7a560440406aa0000467">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall:</by>  Do you support that?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150325a4ab7a560440406aa0000468">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  Do I support reducing red tape? Yes, I do.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Marshall</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150325a4ab7a560440406aa0000469">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall:</by>  No, you don't.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150325a4ab7a560440406aa0000470">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  I note in the Leader of the Opposition's interjections that no, we don't. We do support reducing red tape, and we can do things to try to speed up the processes. If the Leader of the Opposition just says we've circumvented processes, I would ask him to provide evidence. Without having the details in front of me, I can only speculate. Let me give a hypothetical situation about another matter. Perhaps, for example, there is someone who's got a work program and is in constant contact with the regulator and, I don't know, financing is coming to a close and they need to drill a hole, and the application is all in order but the paperwork hasn't been filled out. Is the opposition really asking us to tell people to delay? Let's wait and have a look first at what the answer is before we assume that the Leader of the Opposition's privileged remarks here in the parliament turn out to be fact or fiction.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150325a4ab7a560440406aa0000471">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Mitchell and the leader are called to order. The deputy leader and the member for Heysen are warned a first time and the member for Adelaide and the deputy leader are warned a second and final time. The member for Schubert.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>