<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-03-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="689" />
  <endPage num="761" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Tramlines</name>
      <text id="2015032451c0d96b314840afb0000493">
        <heading>Tramlines</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4843" kind="question">
        <name>Mr WINGARD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Mitchell</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-03-24">
            <name>Tramlines</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-03-24T14:46:04" />
        <text id="2015032451c0d96b314840afb0000494">
          <timeStamp time="2015-03-24T14:46:04" />
          <by role="member" id="4843">Mr WINGARD (Mitchell) (14:46):</by>  Supplementary to the Minister for Transport: given that the report said that total reconciliation of the project would have required digging up King William Street to get what was scoped and what was paid for by the taxpayers, can the minister outline whether or not King William Street will be dug up and full restoration will be made of the project?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-03-24">
            <name>Tramlines</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-03-24T14:46:23" />
        <text id="2015032451c0d96b314840afb0000495">
          <timeStamp time="2015-03-24T14:46:23" />
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister Assisting the Minister for Planning, Minister Assisting the Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (14:46):</by>  Indeed, it is a good question. I said in my previous answer that the department has given me advice that they anticipate that the rectification works will meet the terms of the contract as originally entered into between the department and the contractor to deliver the rail infrastructure and to facilitate the services on there.</text>
        <text id="2015032451c0d96b314840afb0000496">While there may have been a report which advocated particular ways in which redress could be applied to how the rectification works were undertaken, the advice that has been provided to me is that the rectification works that will be provided by the contractor will, very roughly, be conducted in two different ways. There will be some rectification works which will be conducted while tram services are not running, in particular, after the cessation of night-time services and the commencement of morning services. There is the requirement for some disturbance of the line, off the top of my head, in the proximity of the tramline underneath the Morphett Street Bridge, which will require some disturbance to the track.</text>
        <text id="2015032451c0d96b314840afb0000497">The tramline itself, as you would expect, has scheduled maintenance. The maintenance can be conducted on a fairly regular periodic basis without interruptions to services. But from time to time some of that regular scheduled maintenance requires a pause in services while more detailed maintenance is undertaken. The item of rectification works which is likely to require the interruption of services is being delayed until the next period of scheduled maintenance, which would have briefly interrupted services in any event.</text>
        <text id="2015032451c0d96b314840afb0000498">So, in those two ways, with the balance of the rectification works being conducted so as not to interrupt services, with the exception of that one particular one, I am so advised, interruption to services will be minimised. I am happy, however, to provide any more detail that I can to the member for Mitchell about this matter.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>