<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-03-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="689" />
  <endPage num="761" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Tramlines</name>
      <text id="20150324c8e924bab361434680000489">
        <heading>Tramlines</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4843" kind="question">
        <name>Mr WINGARD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Mitchell</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-03-24">
            <name>Tramlines</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-03-24T14:44:42" />
        <text id="20150324c8e924bab361434680000490">
          <timeStamp time="2015-03-24T14:44:42" />
          <by role="member" id="4843">Mr WINGARD (Mitchell) (14:44):</by>  To the Treasurer again: can the Treasurer confirm to the house that he did forget the report?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-03-24">
            <name>Tramlines</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-03-24T14:44:54" />
        <text id="20150324c8e924bab361434680000491">
          <timeStamp time="2015-03-24T14:44:54" />
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister Assisting the Minister for Planning, Minister Assisting the Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (14:44):</by>  Mr Speaker, this is clearly an issue which falls within my portfolio responsibilities. As I made reference to at the time when the question came up in December, I had no knowledge of it. In fact, I think as the member for Mitchell made reference (I can't recall whether it was in the house or publicly in the media), he was surprised that I didn't know. That might be, from my perspective, an euphemistic way of acknowledging my sentiment when I wasn't briefed by my department about it, and that's been acknowledged.</text>
        <page num="723" />
        <text id="20150324c8e924bab361434680000492">Really, the nub of the matter is that some work was undertaken by a contractor, on behalf of the department, to deliver the tram project. That work has been found not to be up to scratch. There have been some discussions between the contractor and the department. That company is now undertaking some rectification works, and the department advises me that those rectification works are anticipated to address the terms of the contract that was originally entered into between the department and the contractor.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>