<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-03-19" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="613" />
  <endPage num="688" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Council Rate Concessions</name>
      <text id="20150319b32dd4ef02684007a0000522">
        <heading>Council Rate Concessions</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3118" kind="question">
        <name>Mr GRIFFITHS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Goyder</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-03-19">
            <name>Council Rate Concessions</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-03-19T14:42:21" />
        <text id="20150319b32dd4ef02684007a0000523">
          <timeStamp time="2015-03-19T14:42:21" />
          <by role="member" id="3118">Mr GRIFFITHS (Goyder) (14:42):</by>  Sir, this question is directed to the Minister for Local Government as it related to my initial question. Indeed, as the minister's agreement with the Premier for government to be formed included the need for review of local government pensioner concessions and council rates, how has he allowed that to be flagged to be cut completely from 1 July 2015?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-03-19">
            <name>Council Rate Concessions</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-03-19T14:42:43" />
        <text id="20150319b32dd4ef02684007a0000524">
          <timeStamp time="2015-03-19T14:42:43" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (14:42):</by>  My agreement with the member for Frome permits him to advance all of the measures that he wishes to advance as an Independent member of parliament in the context of cabinet. Can I say that the member for Frome was pivotal. In a budget where we had $898 million ripped out of us by the federal government, he played a pivotal role in ensuring that we stood up for pensioners and resisted this federal cut. Of course, it is intelligent for us to campaign against those cuts.</text>
        <text id="20150319b32dd4ef02684007a0000525">I know those opposite are fond of saying that around the nation all except Western Australia have actually accommodated these cuts, but remember: each of those states and territories, or almost every one of those states and territories, were facing state elections. They realised, because they were incumbent Liberal governments, that they didn't want to be tarred with the federal Liberal cut, so they were hardly going to stand up. We were in a much better position to stand up against these cuts than those poor old state Liberal governments, some of which were absentmindedly misplaced by their electors, according to the Prime Minister, at the last two most recent state elections.</text>
        <text id="20150319b32dd4ef02684007a0000526">So, this is the reason the pattern of changes has occurred across the nation. We’re standing up. When I attend COAG on 17 April, we will be pressing again for the Prime Minister to resist those cuts. The member for Frome played a pivotal role. In a budget where we could barely afford it, we stepped in for one year to cover that $30 million cut from the commonwealth.</text>
        <text id="20150319b32dd4ef02684007a0000527">We will have to consider our position after the federal budget. But all eyes should be on the federal budget. We are going to concentrate the attention of every federal and state member of parliament in South Australia on this crucial question. I must say that the federal members—and I know those opposite have very close, personal relationships with a number of federal members, including the member of Sturt, who has had a—</text>
        <text id="20150319b32dd4ef02684007a0000528">
          <event kind="interjection">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150319b32dd4ef02684007a0000529">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Well, he's had a big week.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>An honourable member</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150319b32dd4ef02684007a0000530">
          <by role="office">An honourable member:</by>  He's a fixer.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150319b32dd4ef02684007a0000531">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  He is a fixer. Let's see whether he can fix this because this will be a test of his capacity to fix things. We will be inviting him to fix this little problem, otherwise the people of Sturt may fix him.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4339" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Whetstone</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150319b32dd4ef02684007a0000532">
          <by role="member" id="4339">Mr Whetstone:</by>  You want him to fix your useless government.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150319b32dd4ef02684007a0000533">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS:</by>  Supplementary, Mr Speaker.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150319b32dd4ef02684007a0000534">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Chaffey is warned a second and final time. The member for MacKillop.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>