<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-03-18" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="535" />
  <endPage num="611" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection Screening</name>
      <text id="201503189352fafb2bca4c42b0000414">
        <heading>Child Protection Screening</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4340" kind="question">
        <name>Ms SANDERSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Adelaide</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-03-18">
            <name>Child Protection Screening</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-03-18T14:40:10" />
        <text id="201503189352fafb2bca4c42b0000415">
          <timeStamp time="2015-03-18T14:40:10" />
          <by role="member" id="4340">Ms SANDERSON (Adelaide) (14:40):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Education and Child Development. Has the minister now identified the flaws in the process of screening and ongoing monitoring of Families SA staff that allowed issues of high concern regarding 20 per cent of residential care workers going undetected and unactioned until they were uncovered via the audit of front-line workers undertaken by Mal Hyde last year?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4622" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.E. CLOSE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education and Child Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-03-18">
            <name>Child Protection Screening</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-03-18T14:40:38" />
        <text id="201503189352fafb2bca4c42b0000416">
          <timeStamp time="2015-03-18T14:40:38" />
          <by role="member" id="4622">The Hon. S.E. CLOSE (Port Adelaide—Minister for Education and Child Development, Minister for the Public Sector) (14:40):</by>  I think we just need to disentangle some of the assumptions there because that is a characterisation that does not ring well in my ears. What the Hyde audit undertook to do—and it was initiated by my predecessor in a very responsible move—was to ascertain what processes had been used to employ people who were working in the residential care area.</text>
        <text id="201503189352fafb2bca4c42b0000417">A variety of processes had been undertaken over several years and it was the view that some of them were less satisfactory than others. The process has been gone through and a number of staff have been cleared and are at work. I believe a couple are still being investigated, and we are aware of that investigation. However, it was a very responsible approach in order to make sure that high standards were being applied. In saying that, I note that our standards improve over time. Our expectations improve and our capacity to test and measure the qualities that we are looking for in our staff also improve.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>