<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-03-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="463" />
  <endPage num="533" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Health Review</name>
      <text id="20150317c93439f47e564c6580000450">
        <heading>Health Review</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-03-17">
            <name>Health Review</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-03-17T14:31:37" />
        <text id="20150317c93439f47e564c6580000451">
          <timeStamp time="2015-03-17T14:31:37" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:31):</by>  My question is again to the Minister for Health. Has the government had talks with any private sector parties on the future of the Repat Hospital or the Hampstead Rehabilitation Centre sites?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-03-17">
            <name>Health Review</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-03-17T14:31:48" />
        <text id="20150317c93439f47e564c6580000452">
          <timeStamp time="2015-03-17T14:31:48" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Minister for Health, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Health Industries) (14:31):</by>  Certainly, we have had some approaches, or I have had very low-key approaches from some healthcare providers who are interested in the site. I made quite clear to them that, with regard to the future of the site, the government will develop a process and they will be able to participate in that process and put proposals to the government. But there will be a very rigorous process around this. No decisions have been made other than what I have said; that is, the site will continue to be used for aged care, healthcare and community purposes.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>