<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-02-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="377" />
  <endPage num="462" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection</name>
      <text id="2015022625b1ddfcf0614d4090000532">
        <heading>Child Protection</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4340" kind="question">
        <name>Ms SANDERSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Adelaide</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-02-26">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-02-26T14:26:10" />
        <text id="2015022625b1ddfcf0614d4090000533">
          <timeStamp time="2015-02-26T14:26:10" />
          <by role="member" id="4340">Ms SANDERSON (Adelaide) (14:26):</by>  My question again is to the Minister for Education and Child Development. Is Families SA still failing to investigate all tier 2 notifications to the Child Abuse Report Line as revealed by the former minister on 23 September last year?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4622" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.E. CLOSE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education and Child Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-02-26">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-02-26T14:26:29" />
        <text id="2015022625b1ddfcf0614d4090000534">
          <timeStamp time="2015-02-26T14:26:29" />
          <by role="member" id="4622">The Hon. S.E. CLOSE (Port Adelaide—Minister for Education and Child Development, Minister for the Public Sector) (14:26):</by>  It is the case that not all tier 2 notifications are investigated and there are a number of reasons why that is the case. Some are a repeat of a notification that has already been received in another form. In some cases it may be that Families SA is already undertaking work with that family and that that notification does not merit any particular investigation given the extent of the engagement that Families SA is already having with that family.</text>
        <text id="2015022625b1ddfcf0614d4090000535">It is also the case that, if a matter is being addressed by SAPOL, for example, that will be regarded as closed from the notification CARL line, but will be being actively investigated through SAPOL and it is also the case that some are referred to NGOs for appropriate follow-up. So without wishing to be defensive about whether we can do a better job with management of notifications, and I am very aware of the considerations being undertaken by the Coroner at present and await with interest the result of that, there are multiple reasons rather than just one simplistic approach to understanding tier 2s.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>