<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-02-11" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="39" />
  <endPage num="130" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Health Review</name>
      <text id="20150211efb1143f831048e390000867">
        <heading>Health Review</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1807" kind="question">
        <name>Dr McFETRIDGE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Morphett</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-02-11">
            <name>Health Review</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-02-11T14:41:05" />
        <text id="20150211efb1143f831048e390000868">
          <timeStamp time="2015-02-11T14:41:05" />
          <by role="member" id="1807">Dr McFETRIDGE (Morphett) (14:41):</by>  My question is again to the Minister for Health. Can the minister tell us: why did the minister ignore the submission of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine that stated our emergency departments could not cope with the proposed changes?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-02-11">
            <name>Health Review</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-02-11T14:41:21" />
        <text id="20150211efb1143f831048e390000869">
          <timeStamp time="2015-02-11T14:41:21" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Minister for Health, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Health Industries) (14:41):</by>  I think the member for Morphett is somewhat verballing the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine, or the South Australian branch of it, because it's not quite what they have said. They have made quite clear that, of course, if you just closed emergency departments down and expected all the patients that currently go to those emergency departments to go to one of the three, of course they wouldn't be able to cope, but no-one is suggesting that happen, apart from the opposition of course, but certainly that is not coming from me or anyone else in health.</text>
        <text id="20150211efb1143f831048e390000870">We are talking about relatively small numbers of patients. As I talked about with the Noarlunga Hospital, it is a very, very small increase in presentations, about 7 per cent of the total presentations that currently go to Noarlunga. As I said, the director of the Southern Adelaide Local Health Network emergency, Professor Alan O'Connor, estimated about six ambulances a day. With regard to the Modbury Hospital, a half of 1 per cent of presentations that go currently to the Modbury emergency department would need to go straight to the Lyell McEwin or the Royal Adelaide Hospital. There are good reasons to do this, very, very good reasons to do this, and that is because we have a particular problem in our emergency departments with after-hours cover by senior clinicians and the services around those clinicians.</text>
        <page num="89" />
        <text id="20150211efb1143f831048e390000871">We don't have, at all of our sites, 24-hour access to medical imaging or various diagnostic services. We don't have senior clinicians on after midnight across all of our sites. We need to make sure that at least at a certain number of our emergency departments they do have appropriate access 24/7 to senior clinicians and to medical imaging and the other diagnostic services so that people don't have their treatment delayed, which is currently what happens. That's why, in something like presentations such as stroke, we have completely unacceptable outcomes. As Minister for Health, I can't stand by and allow us to continue to have a system where we have three times the number of people dying from stroke between midnight and 8am than during other times of the day. I'm putting forward a plan to change it to make our system work better, so that we get more consistency of care. What do we get from the opposition? Nothing but harping and grumbling and scaremongering.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150211efb1143f831048e390000872">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The minister is not responsible for the opposition. The member for Newland.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1807">
        <name>Dr McFETRIDGE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150211efb1143f831048e390000873">
          <by role="member" id="1807">Dr McFETRIDGE:</by>  Supplementary, Mr Speaker?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20150211efb1143f831048e390000874">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  No, we will come back to you. Member for Newland.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>