<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-02-10" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1" />
  <endPage num="37" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
      <text id="2015021000a752761de441c980000503">
        <heading>Gillman Land Sale</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-02-10">
            <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-02-10T17:31:13" />
        <text id="2015021000a752761de441c980000504">
          <timeStamp time="2015-02-10T17:31:13" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (17:31):</by>  Supplementary: between the meeting of the Premier in June 2013 with Mr Spencer, which has been referred to, and the cabinet meeting to grant the approval, there was a period of assessment by Renewal SA of the proposal. I was specifically asking, in that period, what involvement there was of the Premier in that process?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Child Protection Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-02-10">
            <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-02-10T17:31:46" />
        <text id="2015021000a752761de441c980000505">
          <timeStamp time="2015-02-10T17:31:46" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Child Protection Reform) (17:31):</by>  I suspect that, because the Premier at the relevant time was the treasurer, if I'm not mistaken, then it is clear from the material which has been publicly revealed that officers of the Treasury produced coordinating comments—additional comments, addenda—to a cabinet submission, so there was some Treasury perspective on this offered as part and parcel of the cabinet submission. I guess one could say that the Premier, wearing his hat as treasurer, had officers who provided information which supplemented the material before the cabinet. Aside from that, so far as I am aware, the situation is simply that the Premier participated, as the rest of us did, in the cabinet process.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>