<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-12-03" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3157" />
  <endPage num="3235" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection</name>
      <text id="201412030af72252875e4d06b0000614">
        <heading>Child Protection</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4340" kind="question">
        <name>Ms SANDERSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Adelaide</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-12-03">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-12-03T14:45:32" />
        <text id="201412030af72252875e4d06b0000615">
          <timeStamp time="2014-12-03T14:45:32" />
          <by role="member" id="4340">Ms SANDERSON (Adelaide) (14:45):</by>  Supplementary.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201412030af72252875e4d06b0000616">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  A supplementary? You won't be requiring the paper, then?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4340" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Ms SANDERSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201412030af72252875e4d06b0000617">
          <by role="member" id="4340">Ms SANDERSON:</by>  No, that's right; I won't. Does the minister think it's appropriate—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201412030af72252875e4d06b0000618">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER:</by>  Point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201412030af72252875e4d06b0000619">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  If the point of order is the member for Unley's point of order, the member for Unley's point of order was that no-one should be reading in the chamber. Now, we can enforce that strictly or we can honour it in the breach. Which is it?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201412030af72252875e4d06b0000620">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER:</by>  Sir, we have established over the last 24 hours and over the last several years that the breach is accepted. The member for Unley didn't, in fact, make a point of order at the time: he made an interjection, which you have since made multiple comments on. In upholding your point of order, I think your continued comments do not add to the debate.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201412030af72252875e4d06b0000621">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Well, the member for Adelaide issued a challenge and said that, given that her supplementaries are supposed to arise from the content of the minister's answer, she wouldn't read further supplementaries.</text>
        <text id="201412030af72252875e4d06b0000622">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>