<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-11-20" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2997" />
  <endPage num="3078" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Council Rate Concessions</name>
      <text id="201411201c02674e705a493190000570">
        <heading>Council Rate Concessions</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3118" kind="question">
        <name>Mr GRIFFITHS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Goyder</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-11-20">
            <name>Council Rate Concessions</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-11-20T14:50:25" />
        <text id="201411201c02674e705a493190000571">
          <timeStamp time="2014-11-20T14:50:25" />
          <by role="member" id="3118">Mr GRIFFITHS (Goyder) (14:50):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Local Government. Can the minister outline how the government's position to no longer fund the approximate $33 million per year in pensioner concessions for local government rates from 1 July 2015 complies with the agreement that the minister made with the Premier in order to form government that states that the Labor Party will commit to a review of pensioner concessions as applied in respect to local government rates and the pre-election position of the minister for pensioner concessions to be increased from $190 to $230?</text>
        <text id="201411201c02674e705a493190000572">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4847">Mr Knoll interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201411201c02674e705a493190000573">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Schubert is called to order because, of course, any member of the government can answer a question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3121" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Pengilly</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201411201c02674e705a493190000574">
          <by role="member" id="3121">Mr Pengilly:</by>  Just like he answered the last two.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201411201c02674e705a493190000575">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Finniss is so close to joining his Kangaroo Island colleague.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Finance</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Small Business</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2014-11-20T14:51:24" />
        <text id="201411201c02674e705a493190000576">
          <timeStamp time="2014-11-20T14:51:24" />
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens—Treasurer, Minister for Finance, Minister for State Development, Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy, Minister for Small Business) (14:51):</by>  I have to say one of the cruellest aspects of the most recent commonwealth budget—</text>
        <text id="201411201c02674e705a493190000577">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201411201c02674e705a493190000578">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  Again, I thought we were on the same page about these cuts, but obviously not. Apparently now we know that the opposition supports the commonwealth cuts. I have to be careful how I pronounce that. You don't want to say it too quickly.</text>
        <text id="201411201c02674e705a493190000579">I think it is important to note that one of the cruellest cuts was the $30 million reduction in subsidies in concession payments for pensioners. We have increased pensioner concessions for utilities and water. We made a commitment to do so in the election campaign. When the commonwealth, with five weeks notice, cut $30 million per annum from concessions to pensioners, the state government stepped in to fill that gap, so pensioners would not be impacted by the cuts made by the Prime Minister and we said on budget day that we would campaign for the next 12 months with the Local Government Association and this government together to have that cut reversed.</text>
        <page num="3039" />
        <text id="201411201c02674e705a493190000580">At the time, the opposition said they would join us. Instead they scoff at us in this place. Also at the same time, to meet the costs of other cuts they have made to our most vulnerable, we removed the remissions from the emergency services levy except for pensioners. We protected pensioners: they have kept their remissions. I have to say the good work of this government and the member for Frome in protecting the most vulnerable in our community from the most savage parts of the Liberal Party cuts are testament to his influence in this government and what motivates this government.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>