<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-11-20" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2997" />
  <endPage num="3078" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Legislative Council President</name>
      <page num="3033" />
      <text id="20141120eb4d93bc615246d5b0000454">
        <heading>Legislative Council President</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-11-20">
            <name>Legislative Council President</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-11-20T14:32:26" />
        <text id="20141120eb4d93bc615246d5b0000455">
          <timeStamp time="2014-11-20T14:32:26" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:32):</by>  Further supplementary, again to the Premier: given the statements made by the Premier in respect of the standing down of Mr Finnigan, pending his inquiry, does he agree that it is appropriate that the President of the other place continues in his role as President pending this investigation?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-11-20">
            <name>Legislative Council President</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-11-20T14:32:46" />
        <text id="20141120eb4d93bc615246d5b0000456">
          <timeStamp time="2014-11-20T14:32:46" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Minister for Industrial Relations) (14:32):</by>  Okay, well, this is another example of the time travel analogy I just gave you a minute ago. We have two separate things: category No.1 is a member of parliament who is subject to a charge which is brought duly before the courts and is being prosecuted—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="interjection">
        <name>Ms Chapman</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141120eb4d93bc615246d5b0000457">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman:</by>  Four years later.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141120eb4d93bc615246d5b0000458">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The deputy leader is warned.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141120eb4d93bc615246d5b0000459">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  —and is being prosecuted for a criminal offence. That is situation A. Situation B is scuttlebutt, which nobody has ever been able to substantiate.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="interjection">
        <name>Ms Chapman</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141120eb4d93bc615246d5b0000460">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman:</by>  What about Julia Gillard?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141120eb4d93bc615246d5b0000461">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The deputy leader is warned a second and final time.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141120eb4d93bc615246d5b0000462">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Scuttlebutt that has never been—never been—the subject of any proof, so far as I am aware, has been—</text>
        <text id="20141120eb4d93bc615246d5b0000463">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="3124">Mr Pisoni interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141120eb4d93bc615246d5b0000464">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Unley is warned a second and final time.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141120eb4d93bc615246d5b0000465">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  —floating around this building for about 20 years and, even in the context of a building with the history this place has, 20 years is getting pretty stale. This sort of rumour floating around this place for 20 years—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3121">
        <name>Mr PENGILLY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141120eb4d93bc615246d5b0000466">
          <by role="member" id="3121">Mr PENGILLY:</by>  Point of order, Mr Speaker: I ask you to deliberate on whether the Deputy Premier is actually debating the question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141120eb4d93bc615246d5b0000467">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  No, I don't think so.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141120eb4d93bc615246d5b0000468">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  To put it another way, this rumour has been in this place for nearly as long as the Hon. Rob Lucas or even yourself.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141120eb4d93bc615246d5b0000469">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  No, nowhere near as long. He was here when I was a cadet.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141120eb4d93bc615246d5b0000470">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Well, not that long, but nearly. Put it this way: only you, Mr Speaker, and the Hon. Rob Lucas remember a time when this rumour was not current. That is a quantitative and qualitative difference between that and a person who is actually being put to a trial on the basis that there are proceedings issued against them which are authorised by the prosecuting authorities. There is absolutely no similarity at all.</text>
        <text id="20141120eb4d93bc615246d5b0000471">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141120eb4d93bc615246d5b0000472">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The deputy leader will leave us for half an hour under the sessional order for repeat offending.</text>
        <text id="20141120eb4d93bc615246d5b0000473">
          <event>The honourable member for Bragg having left the chamber:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141120eb4d93bc615246d5b0000474">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Is there another supplementary on that line? No? Member for Stuart.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>