<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-11-19" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2947" />
  <endPage num="2996" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="20141119d8eac90155234fe8b0000429">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Port Adelaide</name>
      <text id="20141119d8eac90155234fe8b0000430">
        <heading>Port Adelaide</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-11-19">
            <name>Port Adelaide</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-11-19T14:07:33" />
        <text id="20141119d8eac90155234fe8b0000431">
          <timeStamp time="2014-11-19T14:07:33" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:07):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Manufacturing and Innovation. Considering that since the Port Adelaide by-election there have been no government departments move to the area, the Newport Quays development has stalled, the promised $7.2 million Lighthouse Square redevelopment has been shelved, and the Port Adelaide court is due to be closed, does the minister concede that the government's by-election commitment to reinvigorate the Port has been abandoned?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-11-19">
            <name>Port Adelaide</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-11-19T14:08:00" />
        <text id="20141119d8eac90155234fe8b0000432">
          <timeStamp time="2014-11-19T14:08:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister Assisting the Minister for Planning, Minister Assisting the Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (14:08):</by>  As I started saying yesterday when this issue was raised by the leader, the commitment that the government has to move public servants down to the Port is yet another way that the government is supporting the rejuvenation of Port Adelaide. </text>
        <text id="20141119d8eac90155234fe8b0000433">It commenced back in 2002 or 2003 with the significant steps and the significant investments which the government has made to secure economic activity on the Le Fevre Peninsula—the deepening of the Outer Harbor channel to make sure that this would be our pre-eminent export facility in South Australia, the construction of the Port River Expressway, the construction of the Inner Harbour opening road and rail bridges, the construction of the $300 million investment in the Techport Australia facility to build air warfare destroyers, and, of course, should federal governments maintain their commitments at the election, our next generation of submarines which, of course, there is remarkable silence on that side of the chamber about. </text>
        <text id="20141119d8eac90155234fe8b0000434">In addition, we have also made sure that we are committing to a very significant number of investments to make sure that there is greater social and community activity around the Inner Harbour as well. Also there is the recently finished redevelopment of the Hart's Mill precinct, the refurbishing of the heritage buildings, both Customs House and the council-owned Visitor Information Centre, the refurbishing of shops along Commercial Road and making them available to new commercial tenants at reduced rents—</text>
        <text id="20141119d8eac90155234fe8b0000435">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141119d8eac90155234fe8b0000436">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The deputy leader is called to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141119d8eac90155234fe8b0000437">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  —to get commercial activity.</text>
        <text id="20141119d8eac90155234fe8b0000438">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141119d8eac90155234fe8b0000439">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The deputy leader is warned.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141119d8eac90155234fe8b0000440">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  Making it easier to both park and shop at businesses along St Vincent Street, efforts which will be replicated along Commercial Road. There are new activities like the laneway, first of all—</text>
        <text id="20141119d8eac90155234fe8b0000441">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4339">Mr Whetstone interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141119d8eac90155234fe8b0000442">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Chaffey is called to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="2972" />
        <text id="20141119d8eac90155234fe8b0000443">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  The construction of the loop path for walking and cycling around—</text>
        <text id="20141119d8eac90155234fe8b0000444">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="3121">Mr Pengilly interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141119d8eac90155234fe8b0000445">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Finniss is called to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141119d8eac90155234fe8b0000446">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  —the Inner West Harbour. These are all things, along with the recently released Port Master Plan, which will guide the rejuvenation and the regrowth of Port Adelaide. I note with great interest that we have heard a groan from the deputy leader, of course, because there was an article written about this very close to the March 2014 election which sought comment from both government and the opposition about their view of the master plan—and what did the deputy leader say, 'I haven't even read it.' That is what she said, 'I haven't even read it.' Such is their care for what happens down at Port Adelaide that the person responsible for planning policy on that side of the chamber couldn't even be bothered reading it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3121">
        <name>Mr PENGILLY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141119d8eac90155234fe8b0000447">
          <by role="member" id="3121">Mr PENGILLY:</by>  Point of order, sir.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141119d8eac90155234fe8b0000448">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Point of order, very gallant.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3121">
        <name>Mr PENGILLY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141119d8eac90155234fe8b0000449">
          <by role="member" id="3121">Mr PENGILLY:</by>  I would question and ask your advice on whether, indeed, the minister is debating the matter, sir.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141119d8eac90155234fe8b0000450">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I uphold the point of order. He was debating it rather well, I thought.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141119d8eac90155234fe8b0000451">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  Thank you, sir.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>