<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-11-18" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2881" />
  <endPage num="2945" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>South Australia's Strategic Plan</name>
      <text id="20141118dfcf4af5e0b8474ba0000356">
        <heading>South Australia's Strategic Plan</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-11-18">
            <name>South Australia's Strategic Plan</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-11-18T14:22:57" />
        <text id="20141118dfcf4af5e0b8474ba0000357">
          <timeStamp time="2014-11-18T14:22:57" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:22):</by>  If the Premier is genuine about maintaining the State's Strategic Plan, why is the South Australian—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141118dfcf4af5e0b8474ba0000358">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The leader will be seated. The question, 'if the Premier is genuine', imputes that he is not and, therefore, violates the rule against imputing improper—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141118dfcf4af5e0b8474ba0000359">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL:</by>  I didn't mean to impute improper motive, but the Premier has announced that the State's Strategic Plan stands, so my question is: if it stands, why has the government sought to abolish the South Australian Strategic Plan Audit Committee?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2014-11-18T14:23:46" />
        <text id="20141118dfcf4af5e0b8474ba0000360">
          <timeStamp time="2014-11-18T14:23:46" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (14:23):</by>  Because we are seeking to streamline government and do away with those arrangements which are unnecessary. If there are ways in which we can carry out the work of government without committee structures, we will seek to do that. That was the whole point of the exercise about the abolition of boards of committees that were not strictly necessary for us to continue the work of government. There is no reason why this work cannot be compiled by agencies as part of their usual reporting arrangements, and we expect that that will occur.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>