<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-11-13" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2801" />
  <endPage num="2880" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Taxation Reform</name>
      <text id="20141113f4e775a872584a7290000610">
        <heading>Taxation Reform</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-11-13">
            <name>Taxation Reform</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-11-13T14:29:34" />
        <text id="20141113f4e775a872584a7290000611">
          <timeStamp time="2014-11-13T14:29:34" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:29):</by>  Supplementary, sir.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141113f4e775a872584a7290000612">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Supplementary. The leader queried my use of the term 'tendentious' and queried whether it was part of the English lexicon at all:</text>
        <page num="2839" />
        <text id="20141113f4e775a872584a7290000613">
          <inserted>Tendentious…<term>adjective</term> derogatory, calculated to promote a particular cause or viewpoint, having an underlying purpose...</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141113f4e775a872584a7290000614">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL:</by>  You've had far too much time on your hands. My supplementary is, of course, to the Premier. Will the Premier guarantee that the proposed freight network charge on trucks will not increase costs for the trucking industry in South Australia?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2014-11-13T14:30:06" />
        <text id="20141113f4e775a872584a7290000615">
          <timeStamp time="2014-11-13T14:30:06" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (14:30):</by>  Mr Speaker, let's just go back to what the trucking industry has said about this. The objective is to increase the productivity of the trucking industry so that it will actually reduce costs. And, why do I say that? Well, the trucking—</text>
        <text id="20141113f4e775a872584a7290000616">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141113f4e775a872584a7290000617">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Let's just travel back to actually understand where—</text>
        <text id="20141113f4e775a872584a7290000618">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. Koutsantonis interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141113f4e775a872584a7290000619">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The Treasurer is an instant away from being removed from the service of the house.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141113f4e775a872584a7290000620">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Mr Speaker, let's just reflect back on how this debate has developed. The road transport industry have been out there for some considerable time urging the government and the opposition to impose tolls. The reason, presumably, they have been advancing the imposition of tolls was to fund new infrastructure. That was the proposition that was advanced to both the opposition and to the Labor Party.</text>
        <text id="20141113f4e775a872584a7290000621">Both parties ruled out tolls in the course of the last election. We ruled them out on the basis that they were not practical and did not suit the South Australian network and, in any event, we were philosophically opposed to them being applied to motorists, but in relation to the transport sector—the road transport sector, the commercial sector—we didn't believe that they would work appropriately. The idea of industry making a contribution to allow further productive investment in road infrastructure is something that we have supported and continue to investigate and are discussing actively in relation to some mining infrastructure. We are interested in opening up that discussion in relation to network charging. The reason why industry are proposing those network charges—</text>
        <text id="20141113f4e775a872584a7290000622">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. Mullighan interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141113f4e775a872584a7290000623">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The Minister for Transport is called to order.</text>
        <text id="20141113f4e775a872584a7290000624">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141113f4e775a872584a7290000625">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Is that the meat industry I can hear there? They move things on trucks as well. The truth is that the reason why industry is proposing that there be some user charge is because they want an improved road network, which in turn will increase productivity, which in turn will reduce costs. That's why they are advancing it. That's why we are exploring it. We're not interested in building new roads to carry trucks just to create work. We are doing it because it will make an increase in the productive infrastructure of the state, increasing productivity, reducing costs, and so, of course, that's the objective of that initiative.</text>
        <text id="20141113f4e775a872584a7290000626">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4343">Mr Gardner interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141113f4e775a872584a7290000627">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Morialta is warned for the second and final time.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>