<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-10-30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2559" />
  <endPage num="2642" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Privatisation</name>
      <text id="201410302af0323cc7364dd280000566">
        <heading>Privatisation</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-10-30">
            <name>Privatisation</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-10-30T14:30:43" />
        <text id="201410302af0323cc7364dd280000567">
          <timeStamp time="2014-10-30T14:30:43" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:30):</by>  Will South Australian motorists have lower or higher third-party insurance premiums under privatisation?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Finance</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Small Business</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-10-30">
            <name>Privatisation</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-10-30T14:30:51" />
        <text id="201410302af0323cc7364dd280000568">
          <timeStamp time="2014-10-30T14:30:51" />
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens—Treasurer, Minister for Finance, Minister for State Development, Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy, Minister for Small Business) (14:30):</by>  Obviously the government will do all it can to keep third-party premiums as low as possible, and that has always been our intention. Any politician can get up and tell you, 'I can bring down the cost on any function, whether it be water, electricity, third-party,' but the real question is: will they be lower than otherwise they would have been? And that is the real question.</text>
        <text id="201410302af0323cc7364dd280000569">I have to say, it's always cheap and easy for an opposition to say, 'Can you guarantee X,' when the honest public debate is: how much in the normal course of events will premiums go up naturally under government ownership and how much will they go up under the efficiency of a private market operator who is driven by profit? So the question that the opposition should be asking is: can the government guarantee that premiums will not increase by as much, or more than they would have, if it remained under government control? But the opposition aren't interested in those types of facts. All they are interested in is drafting pamphlets for the next election.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>