<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-10-30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2559" />
  <endPage num="2642" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Privatisation</name>
      <text id="20141030a41dfc83d8be4c3ba0000560">
        <heading>Privatisation</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="563" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-10-30">
            <name>Privatisation</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-10-30T14:29:09" />
        <text id="20141030a41dfc83d8be4c3ba0000561">
          <timeStamp time="2014-10-30T14:29:09" />
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS (Davenport) (14:29):</by>  Supplementary, sir, to the Treasurer: if, as the Treasurer claims, consumers are better off with the Motor Accident Commission service being provided by the private sector and the market will provide cheaper premiums, as the Treasurer claims, why did the government rule out the privatisation of the Motor Accident Commission before the election, committing the government to deny the consumer those benefits?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Finance</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Small Business</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-10-30">
            <name>Privatisation</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-10-30T14:29:59" />
        <text id="20141030a41dfc83d8be4c3ba0000562">
          <timeStamp time="2014-10-30T14:29:59" />
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens—Treasurer, Minister for Finance, Minister for State Development, Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy, Minister for Small Business) (14:29):</by>  I reject the assessment of the departing member for Davenport. Unlike him, I am not bored. Unlike him, we are committed to the people we represent, and want to stay here. I don't accept the categorisation that he has just made to the parliament; in fact, we reject it. We believe it is not a function that the government can do better than the private sector. I believe that, and I am surprised that members opposite do not share my view.</text>
        <text id="20141030a41dfc83d8be4c3ba0000563">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Marshall</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141030a41dfc83d8be4c3ba0000564">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall:</by>  Supplementary, sir.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141030a41dfc83d8be4c3ba0000565">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Before the supplementary, I call the member for Chaffey to order, and arising out of a previous question, I warn the members for Mitchell and Heysen a first time and the member for Schubert a second time. Supplementary.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>