<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-10-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2261" />
  <endPage num="2329" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Gawler Rail Line</name>
      <text id="20141015a23f3fe5d22e4b5ea0000573">
        <heading>Gawler Rail line</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="563" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-10-15">
            <name>Gawler Rail line</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-10-15T14:42:57" />
        <text id="20141015a23f3fe5d22e4b5ea0000574">
          <timeStamp time="2014-10-15T14:42:57" />
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS (Davenport) (14:42):</by>  Supplementary question: can the minister clarify for the house whether the $152 million budget is inclusive of the $47 million that has been written off, or does the $47 million that has been written off have to be added on to the $152 million?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-10-15">
            <name>Gawler Rail line</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-10-15T14:43:18" />
        <text id="20141015a23f3fe5d22e4b5ea0000575">
          <timeStamp time="2014-10-15T14:43:18" />
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister Assisting the Minister for Planning, Minister Assisting the Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (14:43):</by>  There seems to be some break in logic within the member for Davenport. We are talking about costs that have been incurred that are deemed by both the department and the Auditor-General to be obsolete. I provided advice to the parliament that the current budget is $152 million, so I am not quite sure how one can accommodate the other.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>