<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-10-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2147" />
  <endPage num="2260" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection</name>
      <text id="201410140a205158e2a4467c80000730">
        <heading>Child Protection</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4340" kind="question">
        <name>Ms SANDERSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Adelaide</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-10-14">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-10-14T15:27:38" />
        <text id="201410140a205158e2a4467c80000731">
          <timeStamp time="2014-10-14T15:27:38" />
          <by role="member" id="4340">Ms SANDERSON (Adelaide) (15:27):</by>  Supplementary: how many other children are presently subject to a Families SA safety plan that condones the use of illicit drugs for their carers?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="614" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.M. RANKINE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Wright</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education and Child Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-10-14">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-10-14T15:27:50" />
        <text id="201410140a205158e2a4467c80000732">
          <timeStamp time="2014-10-14T15:27:50" />
          <by role="member" id="614">The Hon. J.M. RANKINE (Wright—Minister for Education and Child Development) (15:27):</by>  Sir, we have the member for Adelaide trying to conduct the coronial inquest in this chamber and there is a process that is underway, an appropriate process that is underway. I don't accept the assertion that the member for Adelaide makes that people condone drug use—it's illegal.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201410140a205158e2a4467c80000733">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  I have a point of order, sir.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201410140a205158e2a4467c80000734">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201410140a205158e2a4467c80000735">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  I have a point of order in respect of the question that was presented to the minister in respect of how many other children were under these agreements who, obviously, are in a circumstance where there is illicit drug use in the household. It appears that the minister was referring back to the Valentine case and the Coroner investigating that, so I ask that the minister have the question re-read to her or, now that it is clear, she is able to answer the question as to how many other children are in those agreements.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201410140a205158e2a4467c80000736">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The minister claimed she heard the question perfectly correctly and answered it, in her opinion, of course. The member for Reynell.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>