<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-10-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2147" />
  <endPage num="2260" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection</name>
      <text id="20141014c41ef4aa31f5499790000727">
        <heading>Child Protection</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4340" kind="question">
        <name>Ms SANDERSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Adelaide</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-10-14">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-10-14T15:25:52" />
        <text id="20141014c41ef4aa31f5499790000728">
          <timeStamp time="2014-10-14T15:25:52" />
          <by role="member" id="4340">Ms SANDERSON (Adelaide) (15:25):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Education and Child Development. Does the minister support the decision of Families SA to condone the serious illicit drug use of Chloe Valentine's mother?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="614" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.M. RANKINE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Wright</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education and Child Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-10-14">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-10-14T15:26:10" />
        <page num="2186" />
        <text id="20141014c41ef4aa31f5499790000729">
          <timeStamp time="2014-10-14T15:26:10" />
          <by role="member" id="614">The Hon. J.M. RANKINE (Wright—Minister for Education and Child Development) (15:26):</by>  Illicit drug taking is not condoned. It is an indicator of some issues in the family but I think it is universally accepted that children are much better off remaining with their families. The focus of the work that Families SA does is to, as best we can, maintain families because that's where children are better off. That is one thing that is taken into account, but let me just say that when situations arise that are not the best circumstance there are safety plans that are put in place, there are agreements that are made with families, family members, about what will occur under certain circumstances, agreements about restricting access to certain people that they may come in contact with otherwise, behaviours, a whole range of things. The fact is, there were many supports put around this particular family. It was recognised the mother was struggling and there were enormous supports put around her and that was recognised in her trial.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>