<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2014-10-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2147" />
  <endPage num="2260" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Matter of Privilege</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act</name>
      <text id="20141014abac35bfc4c14b5580000013">
        <heading>Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1807" kind="speech">
        <name>Dr McFETRIDGE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Morphett</electorate>
        <startTime time="2014-10-14T11:04:45" />
        <page num="2148" />
        <text id="20141014abac35bfc4c14b5580000014">
          <timeStamp time="2014-10-14T11:04:45" />
          <by role="member" id="1807">Dr McFETRIDGE (Morphett) (11:04):</by>  Thank you, Mr Speaker; there is a second matter. I am seeking your clarification on the interaction between the South Australian Independent Commission Against Corruption and the privileges of this place. At a recent Aboriginal Lands Parliamentary Standing Committee meeting the committee sought evidence from a witness who asked that his evidence be given in camera and on record. During this evidence there were serious allegations made by this witness regarding the conduct of a particular Aboriginal organisation and individuals, some including public servants.</text>
        <text id="20141014abac35bfc4c14b5580000015">At the end of the evidence, I asked the witness, because of the serious nature of his allegations, whether he had considered or indeed had approached the ICAC to give them the information that may require their investigation. The witness stated that it was his clear understanding that, under the ICAC legislation, he could not answer the questions and he declined to answer. Mr Speaker, if a parliamentary committee is not able to receive evidence, particularly in-camera evidence from a witness because of the ICAC, I would see this as an interference in the conduct of the parliament.</text>
        <text id="20141014abac35bfc4c14b5580000016">You are no doubt aware that during the debate and negotiations on the ICAC bill it was very clearly settled that the bill would in no way diminish or interfere with the rights or privileges of the parliament. I refer you in particular to subsection (6) of the bill where it points out that parliamentary privilege is unaffected. I am seeking your ruling on this matter as I am very concerned that the clash between the need to conduct thorough inquiries through parliamentary committees and ongoing investigations or potential investigations by the ICAC should be clarified so that the privilege of the parliament is preserved.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141014abac35bfc4c14b5580000017">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  As I understand it, there was a witness before a parliamentary committee, he or she made allegations, the committee then thought to question the witness about the allegations and the witness said, 'I can't answer your questions because I have given it to ICAC.'</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1807" kind="speech" continued="true">
        <name>Dr McFETRIDGE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141014abac35bfc4c14b5580000018">
          <by role="member" id="1807">Dr McFETRIDGE:</by>  The witness declined to even give evidence to admit whether they had actually approached the ICAC on the issue; that was the concern.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20141014abac35bfc4c14b5580000019">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I see. Alright, I will take advice on that.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>